Determinisme Teknologi dalam Teknologi Komunikasi dan Informasi

Teguh Ratmanto

Abstract


Technological determinism, as the result of technology innovation, raised a constant debate among scholars concerning its position toward the society: whether it was caused by the society, or the effect of social change. This debate, in the end, produced two kinds of party: those who support echnology, and those who against it, both the optimists or the pessimist one. Those who against technology believed that technology in no other way was created by society. The supporter, reversely, strongly believed that technology shaped society, even determine the future. Both party believed there is interplay between technology and society.


Keywords


determinisme teknologi, teknologi, masyarakat, komunikasi

References


Bimber, Bruce. 1995. “Three Faces of Technological Determinism” in Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo (eds) Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, second printing, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Chandler, Daniel “Technological or Media Determinism: Technological Autonomy,” viewed 11 May 2004. http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tdet06.html.

Chandler, Daniel ‘Technological or Media Determinism: Technological Neutrality, viewed 11 May 2004. http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/tecdet/tdet08.html.

Cooper, Simon. 2002. Technoculture and Critical Theory: In the service of the machine?, Routledge, London.

Dave’s Page for technological and Media Determinism, viewed 2 June 2004. http://users.marshall.edu/~anders45/determinis.htm

Evans, Daniela Lesley. 1998. “A Critical Examination of Claims Concerning The ‘Impact’ of Print,” http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Students/dle9701.html viewed 2 June 2004.

Feenberg, Andrew c. 1996. “From Essentialism to Constructivism: Philosophy of Technology at the Crossroads,” http://wwwrohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4.html viewed 11 May 2004.

Feenberg, Andrew c. 1996. “Critical Theory of Technology,” http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/CRITSAM2.HTML viewed

May 2004.

Galvin, Michael. 1994. “Vectory in The Gulf: Technology, Communication and War,” in Green, Lelia and Guinery, Roger (eds) Framing Technology:

Society, Choice and Change, Allen & Unwin, NSW.

Hughes, Thomas P. 1995. “Technological Momentum,” in Smith, Merritt Roe and Marx, Leo (eds) Does Technology Drive History: The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, second printing, The MIT Press, Cambridge,

Massachusetts.

Jhally, Shut. 1993. “Communication and the materialist conception of History: Marx, Innis and technology” Continuum: The Australian Journal of Media & Culture, Vol. 7, No 1, 1993 http://wwwmcc.murdoch.edu.au/ReadingRoom/7.1/Jhally.html viewed 2 June 2004.

Lim, Sharon Y.P. c. 2003. “Technology and Culture: A quintessential human activity,” http://www.u n d p . o r g . m y / f a c t s h e e t / d o c s /

ICTgWriting_2_TechnologyAndCulture,15Oct03.pdf viewed 11 May 2004.

Mesthene, Emmanuel G.. 1970. Technological Change: Its Impact on Man and Society,Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Pannabecker, John R. c. 1990. “Technological Impacts and Determinism in Technology Education: Alternate Metaphors from Social Constructivism,” http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/journals/JTE/v3n1/pdf/pannabecker.pdf viewed 11

May 2004.

Winston, Morton. 1999. “Children of innovation,” in Winston, Morton E. and Edelbach, Ralph D. (eds)’ in Society, Ethics, and Technology.

Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v6i1.1175

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


 

   

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License