Kearifan Lokal dan Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Birokrasi

Irawati Tanjung

Abstract


One thing that considered as a source of systemic and networking corruption in Indonesia is bureaucratic behavior with patrimonial relations approach. Source of bureaucratic pathology essentially can be identified from two locus: internal and external. This paper attempts to explain other possibility to eradicate corruption in bureaucracy by strengthening external environment role. Using qualitative research data in Nagari Kapau of West Sumatra, indicating that culture became one of important strategy to eradicating corruption in bureaucracy. Culture values support the emergence of social structure as a controller of Nagari bureaucratic work. Cultural values are followed by society awareness and participation of their role in overseeing leader and government to become power that be able to power-driven corruption.

Keywords


Kearifan Lokal; Korupsi; Birokrasi; Masyarakat Lokal; Sosial

References


Albrow, M. (2005).Birokrasi (terj), Yogyakarta. Tiara Wacana.

Djafar, W. (2006) Memotong Warisan Birokrasi Masa lalu, menciptakan Demarkasi Bebas korupsi. (https://wahyudidjafar.f iles. wordpress.com/2011/08/memotong-warisanbirokrasi-

masa-lalu.pdf). diunduh pada 7 April 2012.

Etziony, Eva and Halevy, (1983). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Political Dilemma, Revised Edition, Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st Century, New York: Cornell University Press.

Hadiz, Vedi R. dan Dhakidae(ed), (2006). Ilmu Sosial dan Kekuasaan di Indonesia, Jakarta: Equinox Publishing.

Irawan, B. (2012), “Diskresi sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Kajian Kriminologi dan Hukum terhadap Fenomena Pejabat Otoritas”, Jurnal MIMBAR, Vol. XXVII, No. 2 (Desember 2011): 143-149 ‘Terakreditasi’ SK Dikti No. 64a/DIKTI/ Kep/2010.

Jackson, K. D. (1978). “Bureaucratic Polity: A Theoritical Framework for The Analysis of Power and Communications in Indonesia”, in Political Power and Communications in Indonesia, Lucian W. Pye (ed). Berkley: University of California Press.

Junus, G. A. (2002). “Bukan Persoalan Telur dan Ayam: Membangun Suatu Kerangka Analisis yang Lebih Holistik bagi Gerakan Anti Korupsi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Wacana Edisi 14 Tahun III 2002, Yogyakarta: Insisit Press.

Kasali, R. (2005). Change: Manajemen Perubahan dan Manajemen Harapan, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kumorotomo, W. (2005). Akuntabilitas Birokrasi Publik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mac, R.M.I. (1977). Negara Modern (terj), Jakarta: Aksara Baru.

Muhaimin, Y. (1980). “Beberapa Segi Birokrasi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Prisma No.10 Tahun IX Oktober 1980.

Pope, J. (2007), Strategi Memberantas Korupsi (Elemen Sistem Integritas Nasional). Jakarata: Transparansi Internasional Indonesia dan Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Robison, R., and Hadiz, V.R. (2004). Reorganizing Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets, London: Routledge.

Semma, M. (2008). Negara dan Korupsi: Pemikiran Mochtar Lubis atas Negara, Manusia Indonesia, dan Perilaku Politik, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Wibowo, S.R. (2009), Indeks Persepsi Korupsi Indonesia 2008, Siaran Pers Transparansi Internasional Indonesia, http://www.ipkindonesia.org/press-release/2009/01/21/indeks-persepsi-korupsi-indonesia-2008, di akses 9 Mei 2012.

Yunita, E.K. (2009). Pejabat Daerah Pelaku Korupsi Terbanyak, selasa, (http://korupsi.v i v a n e w s . c o m / n e w s / r e a d / 19933pejabat_daerah_pelaku_korupsi_terbanyak). diunduh 9 Mei 2012.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v29i1.375

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.