Eva Rita


In development and reconstruction of roads frequent changes work items, affecting the cost, turnaround time and quality of work. In order to determine what factors cause of the technical justification has conducted a study of eight packages of road construction and eight packages of reconstruction road capacity of West Sumatra in the unit Implementation of National Road Region I and Region II under  theNational Road Agency of West Sumatera Province. The work packages studied wasthe work conducted in 2009 to 2015. The method used was descriptive-evaluative research. Results of the study found the 7 causal factors do technical justification that the initial design of the contract is not in accordance with the results of the engineering field, not taking into account the design life of the road, , has not been calculated in detail the volume and the price for each item of work, do not pay attention to Standard Directorate general of Highways Ministry of public Works, the land is not available when the project is implemented, the results of field surveys for planning is not complete, and the occurrence of overlapping projects between the state and local budgets. To eliminate the occurrence of increased costs due to technical justification is necessary to complete the field survey by calculating in detail the volume and the price for each work item.


road construction, reconstruction/upgrading of roads, technical justification


Bappenas (2006), PP No 40 Tahun 2006 tentang tata cara penyusunan Rencana Pembangunan Nasional.

Chen, J.-H., & Hsu, S. (2007). Hybrid ANN-CBR Model for Disputed Change Orders in Construction Project. Automation in Contruction, Vol. 17, p.56-64.

Idzurnida Ismail (2013). Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Proyek Konstruksi dan Pencegahannya, Jurnal Momentum Vol. 14 No.1. Februari 2013.ISSN : 1693 – 752X.

Kemendagri (2010), Permendagri Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tentang Tahapan, Tatacara Penyusunan, Pengendalian, dan Evaluasi Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah.

Lee, J.-K. (2008). Cost Overrun and Cause in Korean Social Overhead Capital Projects: Road, Rail, Airports, and Ports. Journal of Urban Planning and Development. Vol. 134, p.59-62.

Levy, Sidney M (2002). Project Management in Construction. New York: Mc Graw-Hill.

Suswanto, O.T.V (2014) . Penyebab dan Cara Mengatasi Kegagalan Proyek Konstruski pada Tahap Perencanaan hingga Pelaksanaan di Daerah Yogyakarta. Skripsi S1. UAJY.

Sapulette,W.(2009). Faktor Penyebab dan Pengaruh Change Order Pada Proyek Infrastruktur dan Bangunan Gedung di Ambon. Jurnal Teknologi, Vol 6 No 2, P 627-633.

Soekirno, P., Wirahadikusumah,R., Abduh, M., (2007). Sengketa dalam Penyelenggaraan Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia, Buku Referensi, Konstruksi: Industri, Pengelolaan, dan Rekayasa, Penerbit ITB, ISBN 979-3507-98-5

Subrimen, (2015). Analisis Penyebab Keterlambatan Penyelesaian Proyek Konstruksi Jalan Nasional di Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan, Tesis, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang.

Sugeng, M (2014). Dasar Perencanaan Jalan, Survai dan Data Pendukung. https://independent. academia.edu/maryonosugeng. Diakses 20 September 2016)

Syahruddin, R. (2015). Analisis Kualitas Pekerjaan Pada Kontraktor Gred 5, Gred 6, dan Gred 7 Pada Satuan Kerja Pelaksanaan Jalan Nasional Wilayah I Provinsi Sumatera Barat, Tesis, Universitas Bung Hatta, Padang.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/ethos.v0i0.2239


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Alamat Redaksi:

LPPM Unisba, Lantai 2, Jl. Purnawarman 63, Bandung 40116, Jawa Barat, (022) 4203368 , (022) 4264064. ethos.unisba@gmail.com / ethos@unisba.ac.id



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License