Incumbency Advantage as a Basis of Party Coalition in Regional Heads Candidate Selection

Caroline Paskarina, Rina Hermawati, Nuraeni Suparman

Abstract


Studies on the incumbency advantage have proven that incumbents remain strong candidates in the elections. However, these studies focused more on the incumbent figures as the main capital in winning votes. This article analyzes the incumbency advantage from different perspective as the basis for the formation of parties coalitions in local elections. Using a qualitative method, this article compares three regions in West Java, namely City of Cimahi, City of Tasikmalaya, and Regency of Bekasi to show how incumbent use their advantages in influencing the dynamics of candidate selection within political parties, especially in determining who will become their vice mayor/regent and mobilization strategies during the campaign period. Data is collected through in-depth interview with parties’ elites who were involved in candidate selection. Although not all incumbents in the three regions won, but the results of this research proved the dominance of incumbent in the formation of party coalitions due to their structural position in the party and their access to public resources. This finding confirms the importance of criticizing the practice of transactional politics in selecting the candidates in a figure-based political era.


Keywords


incumbent advantage, candidate selection, local election

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Malik, F., & Ahmad Malik, B. (2014). Politics of Coalition in India (Vol. 2). Online. Retrieved from http://jppgnet.com/journals/jppg/Vol_2_No_1_March_2014/1.pdf

Aragon, F. (2013). Political Parties, Candidate Selection, and Quality of Government. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(2), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0036

Ashworth, S., Bueno De Mesquita, E., & Friedenberg, A. (2017). On the Incumbency Advantage *. Retrieved from https://www.iq.harvard.edu/files/iqss-harvard/files/advantage-incumbency-2017-04-07.pdf

Aspinall, E., & As’ad, M. U. (2016). Understanding family politics: Successes and failures of political dynasties in regional Indonesia. South East Asia Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X16659571

Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering ofelectoral formulas. Electoral Studies, 14(4), 417–439.

Carson, J. L., Engstrom, E. J., & Roberts, J. M. (2007). Candidate quality, the personal vote, and the incumbency advantage in congress. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1017.S0003055407070311

Cheibub, J. A., Przeworski, A., & Saiegh, S. M. (2004). Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000195

Close, C., Kelbel, C., & Kern, A. (2015). Party crashers? How Belgian citizens view democratic innovations within and beyond political parties (pp. 1–27).

Cover, A. D. (1977). One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110580

Cox, G. W., & Katz, J. N. (1996). Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow? American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111633

Dettman, S., Pepinsky, T. B., & Pierskalla, J. H. (2017). Incumbency advantage and candidate characteristics in open-list proportional representation systems: Evidence from Indonesia. Electoral Studies, 48, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.06.002

Erikson, R. S. (1972). Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957176

Feinstein, B. D. (2010). The dynasty advantage: Family ties in congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298010793322366

Fiva, J. H., & Smith, D. M. (2018). Political Dynasties and the Incumbency Advantage in Party-Centered Environments. American Political Science Review, 112(03), 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055418000047

Gherghina, S., & Volintiru, C. (2017). A new model of clientelism: Political parties, public resources, and private contributors. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773915000326

Gordon, S. C. & Landa, D. (2009). Do The Advanteges Of Incumbency, Advantage Incumbent? The Journal of Politics, 71(4), 1481–1498.

Hazan, R. Y., & Rahat, G. (2010). Democracy within Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Johannes, J. R., & McAdams, J. C. (1981). The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election. American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110817

Lundell, K. (2004). Determinants of Candidate Selection: The Degree of Centralization in Comparative Perspective. Party Politics, 10(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804039119

Manor, J. (2013). Post-clientelist Initiatives. In K. Stokke & O. Tornquist (Eds.), Democratization in the Global South: The Importance of Transformative Politics (pp. 243–254). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martin, L. W., & Stevenson, R. T. (2010). The conditional impact of incumbency on government formation. American Political Science Review, 104(3), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000213

Mayhew, D. R. (2008). Incumbency advantage in U.S. presidential elections: The historical record. Political Science Quarterly, 123(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2008.tb00622.x

Paskarina, C., Hermawati, R., & Yunita, D. (2019). Combining Clientelism and Incumbency Advantage : Political Strategy in Candidate Selection for the 2017 Local Head Election in Bekasi Regency. Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review, 4(January), 21–41.

Rahat, G., & Hazan, R. Y. (2001). Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework. Party Politics, 7(3), 297–322.

Rahat, Gideon. (2007). Candidate Selection: The Choice Before the Choice. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2007.0014

Saputra, M. B. (2018). Politics in Indonesia: It’s Business As Usual. Retrieved May 26, 2018, from https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/politics-in-indonesia-its-business-as-usual/

Shapiro, R. Y., Miller, W. E., & Shanks, J. M. (2006). The New American Voter. Political Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657948

Shin, J. H. (2017). The choice of candidate-centered electoral systems in new democracies. Party Politics, 23(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815581539

Shomer, Y. (2014). What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examination. Party Politics, 20(4), 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436060

Smith, D. M., & Martin, S. (2017). Political Dynasties and the Selection of Cabinet Ministers. Legislative Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12146

Spahn, B. T. (2011). Toward a Fuller Understanding of the Incumbency Advantage in State Legislative Elections: A Quasi-Experimental Approach. Wesleyan University.

Stone, W. J. (2011). Incumbency Reconsidered: Prospects, Strategic Retirement, and Incumbent Quality in U.S. House Elections. The Journal of Politics, 72(1), 178–190.

Sukmajati, M. (2017). Calon Petahana. Surat Kabar Kedaulatan Rakyat.

Sulistiyanto, P. (2009). Pilkada in Bantul District: Incumbent, Populism and Decline of Royal Power. In M. Erb & P. Sulistiyanto (Eds.), Deepening Democracy in Indonesia: Direct Election for Local Leader (Pilkada) (pp. 190–210). Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

Trounstine, J. (2011). Incumbency and Responsiveness in Local Elections, 1–38.

Williams, R., & Paun, A. (2011). What works in candidate selection? Party Conferences, (October).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v35i1.4129

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.