Effect of Psychosocial Factors in the Use of Telemedicine

Salsabila Salsabila, Ernawaty Ernawaty


Telemedicine is the impact of industrial revolution 4.0, which urges the development of health system technology to increase access to health services. This condition is contrary to the use of society, where consumers decide to stop using telemedicine services after several benefits. This study aims to identify the effect of psychosocial factors on consumer decisions in utilizing telemedicine services. This study was analytical observational research with a cross-sectional design. The population of this study was consumers aged 17–40 years who needed access to health services. Data collection was done in January–May 2021 by distributing online questionnaires tested for validity and reliability to 198 respondents in Surabaya. The data obtained were analyzed using logistic regression. The results showed that consumer psychological factors, including motivation, psychology, and learning, influenced decisions to use telemedicine services (p<0.05). Meanwhile, the social factors of the reference group did not have a significant effect (p>0.05). High motivation, positive perception, learning, and family encouragement influence consumer decisions to use telemedicine services, whereas the reference group does not. This research can be used as a consideration for healthcare technology developers and decision-makers in promoting the use of telemedicine so that it continues to be used in the long term.


Consumer decisions; health services; health technology development; psychosocial factors; telemedicine

Full Text:



Tursunbayeva A, Franco M, Pagliari C. Use of social media for e-Government in the public health sector: a systematic review of published studies. Gov Inf Q. 2017;34(2):270–82.

Aceto G, Persico V, Pescapé A. Industry 4.0 and health: internet of things, big data, and cloud computing for healthcare 4.0. J Ind Inf Integr. 2020;18:100129.

Rahi S, Khan MM, Alghizzawi M. Factors influencing the adoption of telemedicine health services during COVID-19 pandemic crisis: an integrative research model. Enterp Inf Syst. 2021;15(6):769–93.

World Health Organization. WHO guideline: recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.

Wiweko B, Zakirah SC, Luthfi A. The essence of telemedicine for bridging the gap in health kosmases. Kesmas. 2021;16(2):66–70.

Latifi R, Doarn CR. Perspective on COVID-19: finally, telemedicine at center stage. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(9):1106–9.

Lu HH, Lin WS, Raphael C, Wen MJ. A study investigating user adoptive behavior and the continuance intention to use mobile health applications during the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from the telemedicine applications utilized in Indonesia. Asia Pac Manag Rev. 2022. In press.

Krebs P, Duncan DT. Health app use among US mobile phone owners: a national survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015;3(4):e101.

Wu D, Gu H, Gu S, You H. Individual motivation and social influence: a study of telemedicine adoption in China based on social cognitive theory. Health Policy Technol. 2021;10(3):100525.

Kotler P, Keller KL, Chernev A. Marketing management. 16th Edition. Hoboken; Pearson Education; 2022.

Altmann S, Milsom L, Zillessen H, Blasone R, Gerdon F, Bach R, et al. Acceptability of app-based contact tracing for COVID-19: cross-country survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(8):e19857.

Banskota S, Healy M, Goldberg EM. 15 smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. West J Emerg Med. 2020;21(3):514–25.

Alam MZ, Hu W, Kaium MA, Hoque MR, Alam MMD. Understand the determinants of mHealth apps adoption in Bangladesh: a SEM-Neural network approach. Technol Soc. 2020;61:101255.

Meng F, Guo X, Peng Z, Lai K-H, Zhao X. Investigating the adoption of mobile health services by elderly users: trust transfer model and survey study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019;7(1):e12269.

Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya. Proyeksi penduduk kota surabaya (jiwa), 2018–2020 [Internet]. Surabaya: Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Surabaya; 2020 [cited 2021 March 21]. Available from: https://surabayakota.bps.go.id/indicator/12/197/1/proyeksi-penduduk-kota-surabaya.html.

Dimock M. Defining generations: where Millennials end and Generation Z begins [Internet]. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2019. [cited 2021 April 21]. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins.

Baudier P, Kondrateva G, Ammi C. The future of Telemedicine Cabin? The case of the French students’ acceptability. Futures. 2020;122:102595.

Yenikomshian HA, Lerew TL, Tam M, Mandell SP, Honari SE, Pham TN. Evaluation of burn rounds using telemedicine: perspectives from patients, families, and burn center staff. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(1):25–30.

Könsgen N, Prediger B, Schlimbach A, Bora AM, Weißflog V, Loh JC, et al. Telemedical second opinions in Germany: a customer survey of an online portal. Telemed J E Health. 2022;28(11):1664–71.

Park J, Erikson C, Han X, Iyer P. Are state telehealth policies associated with using telehealth services among underserved populations? Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(12):2060–8.

Ray KN, Shi Z, Poon SJ, Uscher-Pines L, Mehrotra A. Use of commercial direct-to-consumer telemedicine by children. Acad Pediatr. 2019;19(6):665–9.

Jain T, Mehrotra A. Comparison of direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits with primary care visits. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2028392.

Kester A, Ong S, Kurata YB, et al. Technology in society factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine in the Philippines. Technol Soc. 2022;70:102040.

Duarte P, Pinho JC. A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption. J Bus Res. 2019;102(2):140–50.

Almathami HKY, Win KT, Vlahu-Gjorgievska E. An empirical study on factors influencing consumers’ motivation towards teleconsultation system use. A preliminary report about the Sehha application from Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Inform. 2022;163:104775.

Kamal SA, Shafiq M, Kakria P. Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Technol Soc. 2020;60:101212.

Gu D, Humbatova G, Xie Y, Yang X, Zolotarev O, Zhang G. Different roles of telehealth and telemedicine on medical tourism: an empirical study from Azerbaijan. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(8):1073.

Kaplan B. Revisiting health information technology ethical, legal, and social issues and evaluation: telehealth/telemedicine and COVID-19. Int J Med Inform. 2020;143:104239.

Benis A, Banker M, Pinkasovich D, Kirin M, Yoshai BE, Benchoam-Ravid R, et al. Reasons for utilizing telemedicine during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: an internet-based international study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(23):5519.

Gately ME, Tickle-Degnen L, McLaren JE, Ward N, Ladin K, Moo LR. Factors Influencing Barriers and Facilitators to In-home Video Telehealth for Dementia Management. Clin Gerontol. 2022;45(4):1020–33.

Hartono IK, Della TK, Kawi YA, Yuniarty. Determinants factor affecting user continuance usage and intention to recommend mobile telemedicine. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2021;794:012079.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/gmhc.v10i3.10223

pISSN 2301-9123 | eISSN 2460-5441

Visitor since 19 October 2016: 

Free counters!

Global Medical and Health Communication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.