Difference Duration of Labor at BC-MK15 Birth Chair with Conventional Bed in Multiparous
Abstract
Prolonged labor increases the mortality and morbidity of mother and baby. The philosophy of childbirth is a natural process by taking the upright positions. The BC-MK15 birth chairs can facilitate the vertical position of the delivery mother. This study aims to analyze the difference of childbirth duration in the BC-MK15 birth chair with the conventional bed in multiparous. This research was an experimental study of posttest-only control group design. Experimented at Pelayanan Obstetri Neonatal Emergensi Dasar/PONED (Basic Emergency Obstetric and Neonatal Care/BEONC) Puskesmas (Public Health Center) Garuda, Puter, and Ibrahim Aji Bandung from 17 April–26 May 2017. The research samples were 30 multiparous on their first stage active phase of treatment and control group. Sampling method using a random permuted block. Birth measurements using the digital Q & Q stopwatch. The results of the duration during the active phase of first stage BC-MK15 was shorter 250.44 minutes than conventional bed 271.61 minutes (p=0.038). The second stage of the BC-MK15 birth chair was shorter 20.67±2(1.02) minutes than the conventional beds of 26.06±2(1.08) minute (p=0.001). The total duration of the labor of BC-MK15 was 269.42 minutes shorter than conventional bed 299.09 minutes (p=0.011). In conclusion, the duration of childbirth is shorter in the BC-MK15 birth chair than the conventional bed in multiparous.
PERBEDAAN LAMA PERSALINAN DI KURSI PERSALINAN BC-MK15 DENGAN TEMPAT TIDUR KONVENSIONAL PADA MULTIPARA
Persalinan lama meningkatkan mortalitas dan morbiditas ibu dan bayi. Upaya yang dapat dilakukan sesuai filosofi persalinan adalah proses alamiah dengan memanfatkan posisi tegak. Kursi persalinan BC-MK15 dapat memfasilitasi posisi tegak pada ibu bersalin. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis perbedaan lama persalinan di kursi persalinan BC-MK15 dengan tempat tidur konvensional pada multipara. Penelitian ini merupakan studi eksperimental posttest-only control group design. Sampel penelitian multipara kala I fase aktif di Puskesmas Pelayanan Obstetri Neonatal Emergensi Dasar (PONED) Garuda, Puter, dan Ibrahim Aji Kota Bandung. Penelitian dilakukan pada 17 April−26 Mei 2017 yang memenuhi kriteria inklusi berjumlah 30 sampel tiap-tiap kelompok perlakuan dan kontrol. Pengambilan sampel menggunakan random permuted block. Pengukuran lama persalinan menggunakan stopwatch digital merek Q&Q. Hasil penelitian lama persalinan kala I fase aktif kursi persalinan BC-MK15 lebih singkat 250,44 menit daripada tempat tidur konvensional 271,61 menit (p=0,038). Kala II kursi persalinan BC-MK15 lebih singkat 20,67±2(1,02) menit daripada tempat tidur konvensional 26,06±2(1,08) menit (p=0,001). Total lama persalinan kursi persalinan BC-MK15 lebih singkat 269,42 menit daripada tempat tidur konvensional 299,09 menit (p=0,011). Simpulan, lama persalinan lebih singkat pada kursi persalinan BC-MK15 daripada tempat tidur konvensional pada multipara.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Suryani S. Penggunaan konsep fisika dalam pertimbangan untuk menentukan posisi persalinan. JFA. 2013;9(3):116–20.
Lockhart A, Saputra L. Asuhan kebidanan masa persalinan fisiologis dan patologis. Pamulang, Tangerang Selatan: Binarupa Aksara Publisher; 2014.
Nystedt A, Hildingsson I. Diverse definitions of prolonged labour and its consequences with sometimes subsequent inappropriate treatment. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:233.
Putro G, Maisya IB. Determinan sosial dalam kematian maternal di RSUD dr. Abdoer Rahem Kabupaten Situbondo. GMHC. 2018;6(1):74–82.
Syaflindawati, Herman RB, Ilyas J. Pengaruh upright position terhadap lama kala I fase aktif pada primigravida. JKA. 2015;4(3):957–61.
Lowdermilk DL, Perry SE, Cashion K. Keperawatan maternitas. 8th Edition. Singapore: Elsevier Mosby; 2013.
Gizzo S, Di Gangi S, Noventa M, Bacile V, Zambon A, Nardelli GB. Women’s choice of positions during labour: return to the past or a modern way to give birth? A cohort study in Italy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:638093.
Yap BL. The ergodesign of childbirth. In: Roozenburg NFM, Chen LL, Stappers PJ, editors. Proceedings of IASDR 2011: the 4th World Conference on Design Research; 31 October–4 November 2011. Delft, Netherlands: Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology; 2011. p. 1–14.
Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(10):CD003934.
Ondeck M. Healthy birth practice #2: walk, move around, and change positions throughout labor. J Perinat Educ. 2014;23(4):188–93.
Kumud, Rana AK, Chopra S. Effect of upright positions on the duration of first stage of labor among nulliparous mothers. Nurs Midwifery Res J. 2013;9(1):10–20.
Jahanfar S, Amini L, Jamshidi R. Third and fourth stages of labour: sitting position. Br J Midwifery. 2004;12(7):437–46.
Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ, Shehmar M. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(5):CD002006.
Warmink-Perdijk WD, Koelewijn JM, de Jonge A, van Diem MT, Lagro-Janssen AL. Better perineal outcomes in sitting birthing position cannot be explained by changing from upright to supine position for performing an episiotomy. Midwifery. 2016;34:1–6.
Kaur N, Miller L, Njindam D, Rubis N, Sennett F. Engineering design report. Reconfigurable obstetrics delivery bed. Michigan: University of Michigan; 2009.
LINET. Birthing bed AVE 2 [cited 15 April 2017]. Available from: http://www.linet.com/-/media/Media-Catalogue/documents/beds/ave2/ave2-brochure-linet-design-EN.ashx.
Thies-Lagergren L. The Swedish birth seat trial. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute; 2013.
Uryč M. BORCAD Medical, member of LINET Group SE, wins prestigious design award for innovative birthing bed [press release] (3 April 2017) [cited 4 March 2017]. Available from: http://www.linet.com/-/media/Files/Website/linet/news/20170403-Pressrelease-AVE2-wins-prestigious-design-award.ashx.
Shermer RH, Raines DA. Positioning during the second stage of labor: moving back to basics. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26(6):727–34 .
Myers S, Tully G, Hanson L. Assessing progress in labor. In: Simkin P, Ancheta R, editors. Labor progress handbook: early interventions to prevent and treat dystocia. 3rd Edition. Chicester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2011. p. 51–100.
Souza JP, Miquelutti MA, Cecatti JG, Makuch MY. Maternal position during the first stage of labor: a systematic review. Reprod Health. 2006;3:10.
Desseauve D, Fradet L, Lacauture P, Pierre F. Position for labor and birth: state of knowledge and biomechanical perspectives. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;208:46–54.
Nevala N, Ketola R. Birthing support for midwives and mothers-ergonomic testing and product development. Ergon Open J. 2012;5(1):28–34.
Farooq M, Khan AA. Effect of elbow flexion, forearm rotation and upper arm abduction on MVC grip and grip endurance time. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18(4):487–98.
Ebrahimzadeh S, Golmakani N, Kabirian M, Shakeri MT. Study of correlation between maternal fatigue and uterine contraction pattern in the active phase of labour. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(11–12):1563–9.
Murray ML, Huelsmann GM, Ananda W. Persalinan & melahirkan: praktik berbasis bukti. Jakarta: EGC; 2013.
Zwelling E. Overcoming the challenges: maternal movement. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2010;35(2):72–8.
Budihastuti SF, Sunarti HM, Soejono SK. Counseling and coping mechanisms for mother. JEHCP. 2012;1(1):1–27.
Dolatian M, Hasanpour A, Montazeri SH, Heshmat R, Alavi Majd H. The effect of reflexology on pain intensity and duration of labor on primiparas. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011;13(7):475–9.
Sydsjö G, Angerbjörn L, Palmquist S, Bladh M, Sydsjö A, Josefsson A. Secondary fear of childbirth prolongs the time to subsequent delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(2):210–4.
Suzuki S. Clinical significance of precipitous labor. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(3):150–3.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/gmhc.v6i2.2847
pISSN 2301-9123 | eISSN 2460-5441
Visitor since 19 October 2016:
Global Medical and Health Communication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.