An Overview of Knowledge Levels about Organ Topography and Structure among Grade IV Medical Students

Yuniarti Yuniarti, Rizki Perdana, Ariko Rahmat Putra, Fajar Awalia Yulianto, Muhammad Agie Najibullah Wijaya, Wendy Darmawan

Abstract


One of the competencies the students of the graduate medical education is to apply the basic principles of the science of biomedicine, epidemiology, clinical, and behavior in the practice of medicine. Anatomy is one of the biomedicine sciences learned in medical education, including learning about the body's structure and organ topography. This research aims to describe the organ's structure and topography knowledge among the faculty of medicine students. This survey with 88 students was conducted in a faculty of medicine in Bandung city from October to December 2018 using a random sampling method. Statistical analysis using frequency distribution, percentage proportions, and Wald's statistics in the 95% confidence interval. The instrument for validity analysis is Pearsons's correlation, and the instrument for reliability analysis is Kappa's percent agreement. The results showed the average level of knowledge on organ structure and topography. It shows anatomical teaching and learning about the organ's structure, and the topography still needs to be optimized.

 

GAMBARAN TINGKAT PENGETAHUAN TENTANG STRUKTUR DAN TOPOGRAFI ORGAN PADA MAHASISWA TINGKAT IV KEDOKTERAN

Salah satu kompetensi lulusan mahasiswa pendidikan kedokteran adalah mampu mengaplikasikan prinsip ilmu dasar biomedik, epidemiologi, klinis, dan perilaku dalam praktik profesi kedokteran. Anatomi merupakan salah satu ilmu biomedik dalam pendidikan kedokteran yang mempelajari struktur dan topografi organ. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui tingkat pengetahuan mahasiswa tingkat IV fakultas kedokteran mengenai struktur dan topografi organ. Survei terhadap 88 mahasiswa ini dilaksanakan di sebuah fakultas kedokteran di Kota Bandung dari bulan Oktober hingga Desember 2018 menggunakan metode random sampling. Analisis statistik menggunakan distribusi frekuensi, persentase proporsi, dan Wald’s statistic dalam 95% interval kepercayaan. Analisis validitas menggunakan Pearson’s correlation, sedangkan analisis reliabilitas menggunakan Kappa’s percent agreement. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tingkat pengetahuan rerata tentang struktur organ dan topografi dalam kategori cukup. Hal ini menunjukkan pembelajaran anatomi tentang struktur organ dan topografi masih perlu dioptimalkan.


Keywords


Anatomi; anatomy; structure; struktur; topografi; topography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Cebu Declaration on the Acceleration of the Establishment of an ASEAN Community by 2015 [Internet]. Jakarta: ASEAN; 2012 [cited 2018 September 25]. Available from: https://asean.org/cebu-declaration-on-th-acceleration-of-the-establishment-of-an-asean-community-by-2015.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2013 tentang Pendidikan Kedokteran.

Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional. Standar Kompetensi Pendidikan Kedokteran Dasar Indonesia (KIPDI III). Pedoman Nasional Penyusunan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi Untuk Fakultas Kedokteran/Program Studi Kedokteran Dasar di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional; 2005.

Utami MS. Daftar fakultas kedokteran terbaik di Indonesia. 2018 May 29 [cited 2018 September 25]. In: ban-pt-universitas [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ban-pt-universitas.com/2018/05/daftar-fakultas-kedokteran-terbaik-di-indonesia-2018.html.

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Bandung. Pedoman akademik program pendidikan Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Bandung. Bandung: Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam Bandung; 2018.

Cho MJ, Hwang YI. Students’ perception of anatomy education at a Korean medical college with respect to time and contents. Anat Cell Biol. 2013;46(2):157–62.

Bergman EM, van der Vleuten CPM, Scherpbier AJJA. Why don’t they know enough about anatomy? A narrative review. Med Teach. 2011;33(5):403–9.

Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Clinically oriented anatomy. 6th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

Munawaroh S, Kartikasari MND, Hermasari BK. Konsensus pakar anatomi Indonesia mengenai materi inti anatomi sistem pencernaan. J Biomedik. 2018;10(1):1–8.

Papa V, Vaccarezza M. Teaching anatomy in the XXI century: new aspects and pitfalls. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:310348.

Munawaroh S. Penggunaan AC/ID dan active learning dalam pembelajaran anatomi dalam large group. JPKI. 2015;4(1):7–14.

Kim DH, Shin DH, Hwang YI. Effect of alternate dissection on anatomy learning. Anat Cell Biol. 2019;52(1):69–75.

Shastrakar R, Nakhate M. Evaluation of teaching methods in anatomy: a study on first year medical students. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol. 2019;6(3):295–8.

Leung BC, Williams M, Horton C, Cosker TDA. Modernising anatomy teaching: which resources do students rely on? J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520955156.

Yusantaraputera, Yanwirasti, Abdiana. Gambaran pengetahuan dan sikap mahasiswa FK Universitas Andalas tentang rokok. JKA. 2014;3(3):499–505.

Bergman EM, de Bruin AB, Herrler A, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, van der Vleuten CPM. Students’ perceptions of anatomy across the undergraduate problem-based learning medical curriculum: a phenomenographical study. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:152.

Lieu RM, Gutierrez A, Shaffer JF. Student perceived difficulties in learning organ systems in an undergraduate human anatomy course. HAPS Educator. 2018;22(1):84–92.

Nayak SB, Mishra S, George BM, Kumar N. Student project in anatomy (SPA)-making the first year medical students responsible and creative. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(9):JC10–2.

Lombardi SA, Hicks RE, Thompson KV, Marbach-Ad G. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Adv Physiol Educ. 2014;38(1):80–6.

Musil V, Blankova A, Baca V. A plea for an extension of the anatomical nomenclature: the locomotor system. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2018;18(2):117–25.

Qoyim M. Pengaruh komunikasi interpersonal antara dosen dan mahasiswa terhadap motivasi belajar dan prestasi akademik mahasiswa Politeknik Indonusa Surakarta. J Ikon. 2017;1(5):80–9.

Syardiansyah. Hubungan motivasi belajar dan minat belajar terhadap prestasi belajar mahasiswa mata kuliah pengantar manajemen (studi kasus mahasiswa tingkat 1 EKM A semester II). JMK. 2016;5(1):440–8.

Fadhilah TN, Handayani DE, Rofian. Analisis pola asuh orang tua terhadap motivasi belajar siswa. JP2. 2019;2(2):249–55.

Charkhat Gorgich EA, Sarbishegi M, Barfroshan S, Abedi A. Medical students knowledge about clinical importance and effective teaching methods of anatomy. Shiraz E-Med J. 2017;18(12):e14316.

Gole RA, Meshram P, Hattangdi S. Changes in perception about anatomy subject after 1 st year of medical course. India J Basic Appl Med Res. 2015;4(4):453–7.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/gmhc.v9i1.4440

pISSN 2301-9123 | eISSN 2460-5441


Visitor since 19 October 2016: 

View My Stats


Free counters!


Global Medical and Health Communication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.