Increasing Role of the Front Guard in Building Licensing Services in Building Management Information System

Dwi Putranto Riau, Ridho Harta, Bambang Agus Diana

Abstract


Abstract. This study aims to solve  the Building Management Information System service problem by the Guard Bureaucrats in issuing Building Permits and Building operability Certificates, which emphasize digital and integrated services with OSS. The implementation of SIMBG after PP 16 of 2021 regarding buildings brings the problem of frontline services that are not yet ready. The limited capacity and resources of DPMPTSP  that issue permits and Technical Offices that recommend PBG and SLF  technicalities need to improve coordination and be prepared, and many District/City  Governments have not drafted regional regulations on PBG levies. The research method uses descriptive qualitative. Collecting data through in-depth interviews and secondary data. Data  analysis uses data analysis techniques of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. This research resulted in a strategy to improve the performance of the front-line bureaucrats in SIMBG services by increasing limited institutional resources and capacity.

Keywords


Front Guard; Building Management Information System (SIMBG); Building Permit (PBG); The Building Operability Certificate (SLF)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggraini, A. O., Sulistyaningsih, T., & Hijri, Y. S. (2020). Pelayanan Birokrat Garis Depan (Street Level Bureucrat) dalam Layanan Parkir Berlangganan di Kabupaten Jombang. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 13(1), 13–23.

Anonymus. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 16 Tahun 2021 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2002 Tentang Bangunan Gedung. Peraturan Pemerintah, 087169, 406.

Bandung, S. L. A. N., Bandung, J. C., Organization, T. O., At, S. P., & Lan, S. (n.d.). TERHADAP KINERJA ORGANISASI DI STIA LAN BANDUNG. 183–206.

Blijleven, W., & van Hulst, M. (2021). How Do Frontline Civil Servants Engage the Public? Practices, Embedded Agency, and Bricolage. American Review of Public Administration, 51(4), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020983805

Boardman, C., & Sundquist, E. (2009). Toward understanding work motivation: Worker attitudes and the perception of effective public service. American Review of Public Administration, 39(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008324567

Bungin, B. (2020). Post Kualitatif Sosial Research Methods Kuantitatif-Kualitatif-Mixed Methods Positivisme-Postposititivisme-Phenomenology-Postmodern (cetakan ke). KENCANA.

Deddy Mulyadi. (n.d.). Studi Kebijakan Publik dan Pelayanan Publik. Konsep dan Aplikasi Berbasis Analisis Bukti untuk Pelayanan Publik (H. T. G. dan M. Nurafandi, Ed.; edisi revi). Alfabeta cv.

Gubemur, Y. (2021). Yth. 1. 1–5.

Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A Public Service Gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.854401

Kim, D. H. (2010). Do Street Level Bureaucrats Provide Enough Information to citezens? A Case Study of Michican’s Welfare implementation using a computer-assisted content analysis. KAPA Annual Meeting.

Kusumah, R. T., & Suryana, H. (2018). Model Analisis Swot Dan Qspm Dalam Pemilihan Strategi Pemasaran Distro. Seminar Nasional IENACO 2018, 6(6), 433–440.

Lijan, P. S. (2006). Reformasi Pelayanan Publik. Bumi Aksara.

Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Andi.

Maynard-Moody, Steve, Michael Musheno, D. P. (1990). Street-Wise Social Plicy:Resolving the Dilemmaof Street-level Influence and Successful Implementation. The Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 43, N.

Michael Lipsky. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in Public Service. New York: Russel Sage.

Monjoy, L. O. (Jr) dan R. (1984). Interorganizational Policy Implementation: A Theoretical Perspective. 44 no 6, 491–503.

O’toole, L. (1986). Policy Recommendations for Multi Actor Implementation: An Assessment of the Field. Journal of Public Policy, Vo 6, 181–201.

Prasetyantoko. (2008). Corporate Governance. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Purwanto, Erwan A, dan S.D, R. (2012a). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik Konsep dan Aplikasi di Indonesia (Cetakan I). Penerbit Gava Media.

Purwanto, Erwan A, dan S.D, R. (2012b). Implementasi Kebijakan Publik Konsep dan Aplikasinya di Indonesia. Penerbit Gaya Media.

RACHMAN, I. (2018). Aktivitas, Tugas Dan Fungsi Dprd Dalam Penentuan Kinerja Di Kantor Dprd Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Jurnal Administrasi Publik.

Riau, D. P. (2019). Sertifikat Laik fungsi Bangunan Gedung: Implementasi Kebijakan Perizinan Pemanfaatan Bangunan Gedung di Daerah (Dr. Rukin, Ed.; 1st ed.). Zifatama Jawara.

Riau, D. P., & Yuswadi, H. (2014). Improvement Strategy Policy Implementation The Certificate of Building Operability in Probolinggo City. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences, 3(09), 37–47. www.ijmas.orgwww.ijmas.org

Rizky, I. P., Darma, A., Astana, I. N. Y., & Dewi, A. A. D. P. (2022). MELALUI APLIKASI SIMBG DI KOTA DENPASAR THE ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC SATISFACATION LEVEL OF IMB SERVICE THROUGH SIMBG APPLICATION IN DENPASAR CITY. 10(1), 44–51.

Rondinelli, DA, J.R. Nellis, and G. S. C. (1983). Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Recent Expriences. Worlbank Staff Working Papers No 581.

Situngkir, R. (2021). ISSN ONLINE : 2745-8369 Peralihan Izin Mendirikan Bangunan Menjadi Persetujuan Bangunan Gedung Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. 2, 664–672.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v0i0.10463

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.