Perspektif Baru Groupthink: Perbedaan Tingkat Pendidikan dalam Proses Pengambilan Keputusan Kelompok

Marlinda Irwanti, Deddy Muharman

Abstract


This research is motivated by the phenomenon of groups of female who usually frequent and visible to see from even elementary schools until university. The interesting point of this research is, researchers interested in analyzing this phenomenon with questions, whether the difference in education level affects the decision-making process in the female group, adding the complexity of the pre-existing nature within the group members. This study uses interviews and focus group discussions to gather data that are expected to explain the above phenomena by using assumptions and symptoms of Groupthink theory itself. The results showed that there was no difference in the decision-making process of the different groups of the educational level, and other interesting findings that Groupthink does not occur in these groups. This happens because these groups did not shut down their point of view from outside influences, and also the absence of a formal group leader, and the persistence of high mutual understanding of his fellow group members.


Keywords


Groupthink, communication, decision-making, group

References


Anna. L. K. (2013). Berada dalam Kelompok Bikin Wanita Terlihat Lebih Cantik .Diambil pada 16 Desember 2014 dari http://female.kompas.com/read/2013/11/02/1623286/Berada.dalam.Kelompok.Bikin.Wanita.Terlihat.Lebih.Cantik

Aries, E. (1996). Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences: Reconsidering. Oxford University Press.

Bibby, R. W. (2009). The Emerging Millennials, How Canada’s Newest Generation Responding to Change and Choice. Project Canada Books.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Daymon, C & Holloway, I. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. Routledge.

Haynes, N. M. (2012). Group Dynamics, Basic and Pragmatics for Practitioners, University Press of America.

Ierodiakonou. & Charalambos. (2011). the Psychology of Aristotle, the Philosopher: A Psychoanalytic Therapist's Perspective. Karnac Book.

Kebiasaan Aneh Wanita Yang Bikin Pria Heran. (2013). Diambil pada 16 Desember 2014. dari http://www.vemale.com/relationship/love/27847-kebiasaan-aneh-wanita-yang-bikin-pria-heran.html

Raghubir, P. & Valenzuela, A. (2009). Male-Female Dynamics in Groups; a Field Study of the Weakest Link, Small Group Research, Sage.

Rucker. M. (2010). 9 Differences between the Male and Female Brain. Diambil pada 15 Desember 2014 dari http://www.brainfitnessforlife.com/9-differences-between-the-male-and-female-brain/

Shaffer. D.R, & Kipp. K. (2010). Developmental Psychology: Childhood & Adolescence, 8th edition, Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Sugarman, L. (2001). Life-span Development: Frameworks, Accounts and Strategies, Psychology Press Ltd.

The Psychology Foundation of Canada. (2012). Straight Talk about Teens.

West, R. & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing Communication Theory, Introducing Communication Theory, Analysis & Application. 4th Edition. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v31i1.1347

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License