The Complexity Of Government Communication System In Ettawa Crossbed (Ec) Goat Farming In Purworejo

Tatag Handaka, Hermin Indah Wahyuni, Endang Sulastri, Paulus Wiryono

Abstract


The study is aimed to determine the complexity of the environment that is faced by the government communication system and regulation that was used to resolve the issue. The theory used is communication system in the perspective of Niklas Luhmann. The research method used is ethnography. The population of the study are in Purworejo which becomes center of crossbreed Ettawa goat farming. Data collection technique is conducted throught interviews and observations. The results of data analysis show that the government communication system has made regulations to resolve the real problems of crossbreed Ettawa goat farming that is done by breeders. When the government communication system produces the regulation, environmental issue has grown more complex. So the regulation that was made becomes irrelevant to the demands and challenge in the crossbreed Ettawa goat farming. The government communication system is slow in reducing the complexity of the environment and producing regulation.


Keywords


complexity, government communication systems, crossbreed Ettawa goat farming

References


Asrinaldi dan Yoserizal (2013). Ancaman terhadap Pengembangan Sistem Pertahanan Sosial Daerah Perbatasan di Kota Batam, Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, Volume 29, No. 1, Tahun 2013, hal. 1-10.

Berg, B.L. (2001). “Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences”, Boston, Allyn and Bacon.

Daymon, C., and Holloway, I. (2005). “Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications”, New York, Routledge.

Denzin, N.K., and Lincoln, Y.S. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research, diterjemahkan oleh Dariyatno dkk., Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar.

Handaka, T., H.I. Wahyuni, E. Sulastri, P. Wiryono. (2015). Social Capital and Communication Systems of Ettawa Goat Breeders in Purworejo Regency, Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Cultural, Vol. 7 Number 2. pp. 307-315. UNNES.

Jensen, K.B. and Jankowski, N.W. (ed.). (2002). “A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research”, New York, Routledge.

Jones, S.R., Torres, V. and Arminio, J. (2006). “Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education: Fundamental Elements and Issues”, New York, Routledge.

Keputusan Bupati Purworejo No. 821.2/4026/2013 dan No. 74/2013 tentang Struktur Organisasi Dinas Pertanian, Peternakan, Kelautan dan Perikanan.

Lee, D. (2000). The Society of Society: The Grand Finale of Niklas Luhmann, Journal of Sociological Theory, American Sociological Association, USA.

Leydesdorff, L. (2000). Luhmann, Habermas, and the Theory of Communication, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 273–288.

Luhmann, N. (1995). “Social Systems”, Translated by John Bednarz, Jr. with Dirk Baecker, Stanford, Stanford University Press.

Luhmann, N. (2002). “Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Description of Modernity”, Translated by Joseph O’Neil [et al.], California, Stanford University.

Neergard, H. and Ulhoi, J.P. (ed.). (2007). “Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Entrepreneurship”, UK, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

O’Donoghue, T. (2007). “Planning Your Qualitative Research Project: an Introduction to Interpretivist Research in Education”, New York, Routledge.

Peraturan Bupati No. 5 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pembentukan, Kedudukan, Tugas Pokok, Fungsi Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Unit Pelaksana Teknis Balai Penyuluhan Wilayah Pada Badan Pelaksana Penyuluhan dan Ketahanan Pangan Kabupaten Purworejo.

Pole, C. & Morrison, M. (2003). “Ethnography for Education”, England, Open University Press.

Ritzer, G. & Goodman, D.J. (2012). “Modern Sociological Theory”, 6th edition, diterjemahkan oleh Alimandan, Jakarta, Prenada Media Group.

Savin-Baden, M. and Major, C.H. (ed.). (2010). “New Approaches to Qualitative Research: Wisdom and Uncertainty”, New York, Routledge

Syam, N.K. (2003). Mencari Format Sistem Pemilu yang Berkualitas, Mimbar: Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan, Volume 19, No. 1, Tahun 2003, hal. 23-32.

Undang-Undang No. 16 Tahun 2006 tentang Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian, Perikanan, dan Kehutanan.

Vanderstoep, S.W. and Johnston, D.D. (2009). “Research Methods for Everyday Life: Blending Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches”, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v32i1.1778

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.