Ancaman terhadap Pengembangan Sistem Pertahanan Sosial Daerah Perbatasan Di Kota Batam

Asrinaldi Asrinaldi, Yoserizal Yoserizal


Society who lives in the border area faced many problems such as socio-cultural exchange that threatens the existence of ideologies and value systems.  Besides, the economic penetration took place in the border areas also had an impact on increasing the activities of transnational crime.  However, this facts can also threat the state defense system.  This article identifies the threats faced by the society who lives in Batam, that is, economic injustice that led to the strengthening of the labor movement, liberalization encourages transnational crime and the waning of identity in pluralistic society in Batam.  This article also found the socio-cultural system is a potential for local community to prevent the threats against the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia.  This socio-cultural can increase become social capital for developing a social defense system.


Sistem Pertahanan Sosial; Modal Sosial; Area Perbatasan; Sosial


Sriati, N. dan Bahari, Y. (2010). “Pengendalian Sosial Berbasis Modal Sosial Lokal pada Masyarakat di Kalimantan Barat.” Jurnal Mimbar, Vol 26 No 2, pp. 147-158.

Anderson, M. L and Taylor, H.F. (2008). “Sociology: Understanding A Diverse Society”, Ed.Ke-4. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Dariah, A.R. (2005). Perdagangan Bebas: Idealisme Dan Realitas. Jurnal Mimbar, Vol 21 No 1 pp, 115-126.

Chenhall, R. H., Hall, M. and Smith, D. (2010). Social Capital And Management Control Systems: A Study Of A Non-Government Organization. Accounting, Organization and Society, No 35, pp. 737-756.

Csapody, T. and Weber, T. (2007). Hungarian Nonviolent Resistance Against Austria And Its Place In The History Of Nonviolence. Peace And Change, Vol 32 No 4, pp. 499-519.

Ferrante, J. (2011). “Sociology: A Global Perspectives”, Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Fukuyama, F. (1995a). “The Social Virtues AndThe Creation Of Prosperity”, New York: Free Press.

Fukuyama, F. (1995b). “Trust: Human Nature And The Reconstruction Of Social Order”, New York: Free Press.

Guibernau, M. (2007). “The Identity of Nations”, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

Janneli, R. L. (1993). “Making Capitalism: The Social and Cultural Construction Of A South Korean Conglomerate.” Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

Knack, S. (2002). Social Capital And The Quality Of Government: Evidence From The States. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46 No 4, pp. 772-785.

Koentjaraningrat. (1987). “Sejarah Teori Antropologi,” Jakarta: UI Press.

Lowndess, V. and Pratchett, L. (2008). Public Policy And Social Capital. In: Dario Catiglione, Jan W. Van Deth & Guglielmo Wolleb (Eds.). “The Handbook Of Social Capital,” pp. 677-707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mahajan, S. (2006). “Globalization And Social Change,” New Delhi: Lotus Press.

Martin, B. (1993). “Social Defence, Social Change,, London: Freedom Press.

Putnam, R. (1993). ”Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions In Modern Italy,” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Schwarzmantel, J.J. (2008). “Ideology And Politics,” London: Sage Publication.

Slaughter, S & Hudson, W. (2007). “Globalisation And Citizenship: The Transnational Challenge,” Oxon, England: Routledge.

Latief, Y. (2011). “Negara Paripurna: Historisitas, Rasionalitas, Dan Aktualitas Pancasila,” Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wollongong, S.A. (1994). “Social Defence And Community Development.” Australian Social Work, Vol 47 No 1, pp. 48-54.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License