Social Experience and Trust on Prisoners and Non-Prisoners

Dewi Rosiana, Achmad Djunaidi, Indun Lestari Setyono, Wilis Srisayekti

Abstract


Trust is shaped by the role of personal interaction in social experience, including past experiences, individual knowledge of events experienced by close people, and exposure to information from the community. Based on this paradigm, individuals who are formed with different experience, knowledge, and information will have different trust. Aiming to examine the paradigm, this study investigated the differences of trust in two groups of participants with different experiences, i.e. prisoners (n= 68) and non-prisoners (n = 68). Using the questionnaire of trust in institution, trust in people scale, and inclusive general trust scale, the data were analyzed by t-test, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon. Results showed that there were no significant differences between groups in the level of general trust, and there were significant differences between groups in the level of trust in institution. This study supports the opinion that trust is more a matter of culture.


Keywords


trust in institution, general trust, prisoners, non-prisoners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, punishment, and cooperation across 18 societies: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 363-379.

Balliet D., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2012). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090-1112.

Bélanger, F. & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and Risk in E-Government Adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 165-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002

Bauer, Paul C. & Freitag, Markus. (2017). Measuring Trust. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Political Science, Political Methodology. Online Publication Date: Jan 2017. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.1

Edelman Trust Barometer (2018).The Trust Index is an average of a market's trust in the institutionsof government, business, media and NGOs. General population, 28-market global total. Annual global study. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2018-10/2018_Edelman_Trust_Barometer_U.S._Hispanics.pdf

Faturochman, dkk. (2010).Potret Kepercayaan (trust) terhadap Individu dan Institusi. Abstrak. Temu Ilmiah Nasional dan Kongress XI HIMPSI.18-20 Maret Surakarta

Fukuyama. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Free Press Paperbacks, D10 301 1/c. 2.

Irwin, K., Mulder, L., and Simpson, B.(2014). The Detrimental Effects of Sanctions on Intragroup Trust: Comparing Punishments and Rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly 2014, Vol. 77(3) 253–272 American Sociological Association 2014 DOI: 10.1177/0190272513518803 http://spq.sagepub.com

Inglehart, R., Basanez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A cross-cultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Knack, Stephen, & Keefer. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly journal of economics 112.4, 1251-1288.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Trust in large organizations. The American Economic Review, 87, 333–338.

Mulder, Laetitia B. van Dijk, Eric and De Cremer, David. (2009). When sanctions that can be evaded still work: The role of trust in leaders, Social Influence, 4:2, 122-137, DOI: 10.1080/15534510802469156

Nannestad, P. (2008). What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything?Annual Review of Political Science. Vol. 11:413-436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412

Parks, C. D. (1996). Trust and reactions to messeges of intent in social dilemmas. journal of conflict resolution, 134-151.

Putnam, Robert D, Robert Leonardi, and Raffaella Y. Nanetti. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Rothstein B., Stolle D. (2003) Social Capital, Impartiality and the Welfare State: An Institutional Approach. In: Hooghe M., Stolle D. (eds) Generating Social Capital. Palgrave Macmillan, New York

Rothstein B. (2013). Corruption and Social Trust: Why the fish rots from the head down. Social researchVol. 80 : No. 4 : Winter 2013, p.1009-1032.

Tempo. (2018). Survei Charta Politika: DPR Kini Dinilai Lebih Terbuka. Edisi 28 Agustus 2018. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1121502/survei-charta-politika-dpr-kini-dinilai-lebih-terbuka

Van Lange, P. A. M., Vinkhuyzen, A.A.E., & Posthuma, D. (2014). Genetic influences are virtually absent for trust. PLoS ONE 9(4): e93880.

Van Lange. (2015). Generalized Trust: Four Lessons From Genetics and Culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2015, Vol. 24(1) 71 –76. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414552473 cdps.sagepub.com

Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.

Yamagishi, T. (2011). Trust: The evolutionary game of mind and society. New York, NY: Springer.

Yamagishi, T., Akutsu, S., Cho, K., Inoue, Y., Li, Y. and Matsumoto, Y. (2015). Two-Component model of General Trust: predicting Behavioral Trust from Attitudinal Trust. Social Cognition, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2015, pp. 436–458.

Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provisioning of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.110

Zulkarnaen, D. K., Rosiana, D. (2017). Studi Deskriptif Mengenai Trust Anak Kepada Orang Tua (Studi Pada Mahasiswa yang Memiliki Orang Tua yang Bercerai). Prosiding Spesia Universitas Islam Bandung. http://karyailmiah.unisba.ac.id/index.php/psikologi/article/view/7360

Zak, Paul J. &Knack, Stephen. (2001). Trust and Growth, The Economic Journal, Volume 111, Issue 470, 1 March 2001, Pages 295–321, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00609




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v34i2.3650

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.