Understanding the Practice of Ambidexterity through Cognitive Leadership In Family Firm

Retno Kusumastuti


Ambidexterity refers to conditions where an organization performs innovation learning activities in both explorative and exploitative way. Exploitative innovations activities are related to deepening capabilities currently exist, while explorative activities related to pursuit new opportunities. The research objective is to analyze social capital that leads to innovation capability of the family firm. Family firm is chosen based on the uniqueness nature of business that interplays with family and business value. The study showed that innovation learning activities process in family firm conducted by founder who acts as both owner and manager exercised in strategic and contextual way. In this sense, the owner provides social support, trust, and remuneration systems that support the innovation activities learning of their employees. Social capital of innovation learning activities in family firm becomes important because value of family business overlaps between value as a business entity and value as a family. Family businesses chosen are in beauty parlour, culinary, and fashion area. Data in this research are collected through in-depth interview with selected informants in 2017.


Ambidexterity, Social Capital, Learning Activities, Family Firm

Full Text:



Ahmadriswan Nasution, Ernan Rustiadi, Bambang Juanda, Setia Hadi, (2014), Dampak Modal Sosial terhadap Kesejahteraan Rumah Tangga Perdesaan di Indonesia, MIMBAR, Volume 30, Nomor 2. Pp., 137-159.

Alabadi, H.F., Alsachit, H.A., Almajtwme, M.H.., (2018), “Impact of Strategic Ambidexterity on Organizational Success: Strategic Scenario as Moderating Variable”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,Vol. 8 , No. 5, May 2018, E-ISSN: 2 2 2 2 -6990 ©, HRMARS, pp. 324.

Birkinshaw, J., dan Gibson, C. (2004), “Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization”,MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45(4), pp. 67.

Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitave, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications, pp. 78-86.

Coleman JS, (1988),“Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”,The American Journal of Sociology, Volume 94, pp. 95.

Duncan, R. B. (1976), “The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation”, Dalam Kilmann, R. H., Pondy, L.R., dan Slevin, D. (Ed.), The Management of Organization, Volume 1, pp. 167-188. New York: North-Holland.

Dekker P, Uslaner EM, (2001),“Introduction In Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life”, Routledge: London, pp. 1-8.

Famoso, Valeriano Sanchez., Maseda, Amaia., Iturralde, Txomin, (2014), “The role of internal social capital in organizational innovation. An empirical study of family firm”, European Managemen Journal, Volume 32, Issue 6, December, pp. 950-962.

Fukuyama Francis, (2001), “Social capital, civil society and development”, Third World Quarterly, Volume 22, pp. 7-20.

Glenn B. Voss and Zannie Giraud Voss, (2012), “Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains”, Organization Science, pp 1-19, ISSN 1047-7039 (print) . ISSN 1526-5455 (online).

Gibson, Cristina B. and Julian Birkinshaw (2004), "The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity," Academy of Management, Volume 47(2), pp. 209-226.

Gupta, Anil K. and Ken G Smith, and Christina E. Shalley (2006). "The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation," Academy of Management Journal, Volume 49(4), pp. 693-706.

He, Z. L., and Wong, P. K. (2004) ‘Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 15,481–94.

Johansen, Magnus., Nyberg, Lars., Evers, Mariele .,Hansons, Max., (2013), “Using Education and Social Learning in Capacity Building : The IntECR Context”, Disaster Prevention and Management, Volume 22 No. 1, pp. 17-28 r, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kusumastuti, R., Safitri, Nurul., Nurita, Prima (2015), “Kapabilitas Organisasi Melalui Contextual Ambidextery UMKM : kajian Empiris UMKM Depok”, Journal Administrative Science and Organization,Vol 22 Number 1, January 2015.

Kilpatrick S, (2000), “How social capital facilitates learning outcomes for small family businesses”, University of Tasmania, pp. 25-32.

Kusumastuti, Retno., Safitri, Nurul., Firdaus, Nur., Sakapurnama, Eko., Sepliana, Milla., Nurita, Prima., (2016), “Ambidexterity Learning Process for Exploration and Exploitation : A Model of Hybrid Ambidextrous University”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,Special Issue forINTE, ISSN 2146-7242, November 2016, pp. 232.ssu

Robinson D, (2000), “Social Capital in Action”,Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, pp. 185.

Robison LJ, Schmid AA, Siles ME, (2002),“Is social capital really capital?”, Review of Social Economy Number 60, pp. 1-24.

Snijders TAB (1999), “Prologue to the measurement of social capital”, The Tocqueville Review Volume 20, pp. 27-44.

Scheer, Silke, (2009), The Entrepreneur as Business Leader : Cognitive Leadership in the Firm, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 2-5.

Sutopo, Hanny Septimawan (2016), “Vitality of the Village UMKM in the arena of Asean Economic Community”, MIMBAR, Volume 32, Nomor 2, pp. 412-421.

Welsh T, Pringle M (2001), “Social capital. Trusts need to recreate trust”, BMJ Clinical Research Ed., Volume 323, pp. 177-8.

Voss, G.B., M. Montoya-Weiss, , and Z.G. Voss, (2006). "Aligning Innovation with Market Characteristics in the Nonprofit Professional Theater Industry," Journal of Marketing Research, Volume 43, pp. 296-30.

Levine, J.M., and R.L. Moreland (1991), “Culture and Socialization in Small Group”, in L.B. Resnick, J.M. Levine and S.D. Teasley(eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, Washington, DC., American Psychologial Association, pp. 257-279.

Liao, Jianwen (Jon), Jil R. Kickul, and Hao Ma (2009). "Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Volume 47(3), pp. 263-286.

Miller, Le-Breton Miller, Lester, Canella, (2007),“Are Family Firms Really Superior Performers”,Journal of Corporate Finance, Volume 13, Issue 5.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. 2004. The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, Volume 82, Issue 4, pp. 74-81.

Qian, G., and L. Li (2003), “Profitability of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in High-Tech Industries.

Raisch, S. and J. Birkinshaw (2008). "Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators," Journal of Management, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp. 375-409.

The Case of the Biotechnology Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp. 881 – 887.

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp. 8-30.

Verhees, Frans J. H. M., and Mathew T.G. Meulenberg (2004). "Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp.134 - 154.

Voss, G.B., M. Montoya-Weiss, , and Z.G. Voss (2006). "Aligning Innovation with Market Characteristics in the Nonprofit Professional Theater Industry," Journal of Marketing ResearchVolume 43, pp. 296-303.

Zimmerer, Thomas W, Norman M.Scarborough, and Dough Wilson. (2008).Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.vol34iss2pp%25p


  • There are currently no refbacks.

MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License