Understanding Social Capital that leads to Strategic Ambidexterity Practice in Family Firm Business

Retno Kusumastuti


Organizational ambidexterity refers to conditions where an organization perform innovation learning activities either explorative or exploitative way. Exploitative Innovation activities is innovation learning activities related to deepening capabilities which are currently owned, while explorative learning activities related to pursuit new opportunities. Most of previous studies concerning organizational ambidexterity more easily identified on established organization where innovation learning activities usually take place in separate unit which called structural ambidexterity. Whereas on small and medium enterprises, innovation learning activities going through the provision of adequate context, known as contextual ambidexterity. This paper combine the concepts of the social capital components that leads to innovation capability of the organization especially family firm. Familiy firm is chosen based on the uniqueness nature of business that interplay with the family value and business value. The study showed that innovation learning activities process on family firm conducted by founder who also acts both as an owner and also as an manager of the company through cognitive leadership implementation. Social capital in the innovation learning activities in family firm business becomes important because value of family firm business  overlaps between the value as a business entity and also value as a family. There are three family firm business taken as an analysis unit namely salon service, culinary, and fashion. The approach used in this study is qualitative approach with deep interview and observation as a methods in data collection. Research ethics preferably emphasis on aspects of informed consent and the confidentiality of the company name. 


Ambidexterity, Social Capital, Learning Activities, Family Firm

Full Text:



Birkinshaw, J., dan Gibson, C. (2004), “Building Ambidexterity Into an Organization”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45(4), pp. 67.

Creswell, John W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitave, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Third Edition. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.

Coleman JS, (1988), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”, The American Journal of Sociology, Volume 94, pp. 95.

Duncan, R. B. (1976), “The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation”, Dalam Kilmann, R. H., Pondy, L.R., dan Slevin, D. (Ed.), The Management of Organization, Volume 1, pp. 167-188. New York: North-Holland.

Dekker P, Uslaner EM, (2001),“Introduction In Social Capital and Participation in Everyday Life”, Routledge: London, pp. 1-8.

Frey, Lawrence R., Carl H. Botan, and Gary L. Kreps. (2000). Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methos. Second Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Famoso, Valeriano Sanchez., Maseda, Amaia., Iturralde, Txomin, (2014), “The role of internal social capital in organizational innovation. An empirical study of family firm”, European Managemen Journal, Volume 32, Issue 6, December, pp. 950-962.

Fukuyama Francis, (2001), “Social capital, civil society and development”, Third World Quarterly, Volume 22, pp. 7-20.

Glenn B. Voss and Zannie Giraud Voss, (2012), “Strategic Ambidexterity in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Implementing Exploration and Exploitation in Product and Market Domains”, Organization Science, pp 1-19, ISSN 1047-7039 (print) . ISSN 1526-5455 (online).

Gibson, Cristina B. and Julian Birkinshaw (2004), "The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity," Academy of Management, Volume 47(2), pp. 209-226.

Gupta, Anil K. and Ken G Smith, and Christina E. Shalley (2006). "The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation," Academy of Management Journal, Volume 49(4), pp. 693-706.

Johansen, Magnus., Nyberg, Lars., Evers, Mariele .,Hansons, Max., (2013), “Using Education and Social Learning in Capacity Building : The IntECR Context”, Disaster Prevention and Management, Volume 22 No. 1, pp. 17-28 r, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Kilpatrick S, (2000), “How social capital facilitates learning outcomes for small family businesses”, University of Tasmania.

Kusumastuti, Retno., Safitri, Nurul., Firdaus, Nur., Sakapurnama, Eko., Sepliana, Milla., Nurita, Prima., (2016), “Ambidexterity Learning Process for Exploration and Exploitation : A Model of Hybrid Ambidextrous University”, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology,Special Issue for INTE, ISSN 2146-7242, November 2016, pp. 232.ssu

Robinson D, (2000), “Social Capital in Action”, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, pp. 185.

Robison LJ, Schmid AA, Siles ME, (2002), “Is social capital really capital?”, Review of Social Economy Number 60, pp. 1-24.

Snijders TAB (1999), “Prologue to the measurement of social capital”, The Tocqueville Review Volume 20, pp. 27-44.

Welsh T, Pringle M (2001), “Social capital. Trusts need to recreate trust”, BMJ Clinical Research Ed., Volume 323, pp. 177-8.

Voss, G.B., M. Montoya-Weiss, , and Z.G. Voss, (2006). "Aligning Innovation with Market Characteristics in the Nonprofit Professional Theater Industry," Journal of Marketing Research, Volume 43, pp. 296-30.

Liao, Jianwen (Jon), Jil R. Kickul, and Hao Ma (2009). "Organizational Dynamic Capability and Innovation: An Empirical Examination of Internet Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Volume 47(3), pp. 263-286.

Miller, Le-Breton Miller, Lester, Canella, (2007), “Are Family Firms Really Superior Performers”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Volume 13, Issue 5.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. 2004. The Ambidextrous Organization. Harvard Business Review, Volume 82, Issue 4, pp. 74-81.

Qian, G., and L. Li (2003), “Profitability of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises in High-Tech Industries.

Raisch, S. and J. Birkinshaw (2008). "Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators," Journal of Management, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp. 375-409.

The Case of the Biotechnology Industry,” Strategic Management Journal, Volume 24, Issue 9, pp. 881 – 887.

Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. 1996. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp. 8-30.

Verhees, Frans J. H. M., and Mathew T.G. Meulenberg (2004). "Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp.134 - 154.

Voss, G.B., M. Montoya-Weiss, , and Z.G. Voss (2006). "Aligning Innovation with Market Characteristics in the Nonprofit Professional Theater Industry," Journal of Marketing Research Volume 43, pp. 296-303.

Zimmerer, Thomas W, Norman M.Scarborough, and Dough Wilson. (2008). Essentials of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.vol34iss2pp%25p


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.