The Meaning of Embroidery and Kelom Geulis as a Business based on Local Wisdom
Abstract
This research aims to reveal the construction of meaning of Tasikmalaya handicraft entrepreneurs in maintaining their existence in the midst of global competition today. The business of kelom geulis (beautiful wooden sandals) is the object of this study because it has functional value and there are many demands from buyers. Using qualitative with a phenomenological approach, research data is collected through direct observation, in-depth interviews with kelom geulis and bordir (embroidery) entrepreneurs, as well as documentation studies to complete the data gathered from the location. The result shows that the business of embroidery and kelom geulis is an effort to preserve local cultural heritage and identity of Tasikmalaya unique handicraft from extinction. This research concludes that Tasikmalaya City handicraft entrepreneurs interpreted the embroidery and kelom geulis business as an effort to fulfill life necessities and preserve the ancestor's heritage to maintain the identity of Tasikmalaya as handicraft center that has long been known.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdi, F. F., Hafiar, H., & Novianti, E. (2015). Perilaku Komunikasi Etnis Tionghoa Peranakan dalam Bisnis Keluarga. Jurnal Komunikasi, 9(2), 105–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.21107/ilkom.v9i2.1190. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from http://journal.trunojoyo.ac.id/komunikasi/article/view/1190/1012
Aulia, T.O.S., Dharmawan, A.H.(2010). Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Air di Kampung Kuta. Sodality: Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi dan Ekologi Manusia, 4(3): 345-355.
Bajari, A. (2009). Konstruksi Makna dan Perilaku Komunikasi pada Anak Jalanan di Cirebon: Studi Fenomenologi pada Anak Pengamen Kota dan Anak Pengemis di Lingkungan Makam Sunan Gunung Jati Cirebon, Disertasi, Pascasarjana Universitas Padjadjaran.
Bruce, C. (2003). The Seven Faces of Information Literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
Bryman, A. (2016). Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bungin, M.B. (2011). Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitaif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Darusman, Y. (2016). Kearifan Lokal Kerajinan Bordir Tasikmalaya sebagai Ekonomi Kreatif Terbuka untuk Modern (Studi di Kota Tasikmalaya Jawa Barat). Journal of Nonformal Education, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v2i2.6556. Retrieved March 22, 2019 from https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jne/article/view/6556/5187
Darusman, Y., Mumu, Mustakim, Herwina, W. (2019). Model Pewarisan Budaya melalui Pendidikan Informal (Pendidikan Tradisional) pada Masyarakat Pengrajin Kayu. Wacana Akademika, 3(1): 95-108. http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/wacanaakademika/article/view/4034
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Diniati, A., Nuraeni, R., & Mahadian, A. B. (2015). Makna Konsep Diri Mantan Anak Jalanan. Jurnal Kajian Komunikasi, 3(1), 41-47. https://doi.org/10.24198/jkk.v3i1.7392
Fajarini, U.(2014). Peranan Kearifan Lokal dalam Pendidikan Karakter. Sosio Didaktika 1(2): 123-130.
Githui, W., David, N., and Maurice, S. (2015). The Role of Indigenous Knowledge in Socio-Economic Development. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 4(4) April: 32-37. [online) at https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v4i4/16111405.pdf.
Griffin, E. (2006). A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.
Ida. (2018, May 16). Personal interview.
Kuswarno, E, (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Komunikasi Fenomenologi, Konsepsi dan Contoh Penelitian. Bandung:Widya Padjadjaran.
Mala, P.A. (2016). Manajemen Kesan melalui Foto Selfie dalam Facebook: Studi Fenomenologi pada Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi UMS. Komuniti VIII(1), Maret: 47-52. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v8i1.2933. Retrieved April 22, 2019, from http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/komuniti/article/view/2933/1873.
Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhaimin, Eming. (2018, April 22). Personal interview.
Nazmia. (2018, July 16). Personal interview.
Puspitasari, S.N. (2016, October 22). Pemda Harus Serius Lestarikan Warisan Budaya. Retrieved from https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/nasional/2016/10/28/pemda-harus-serius-lestarikan-warisan-budaya-383369
Ramdhani, Iman. (2018, April 21). Personal interview.
Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sedayu, G. (2014). Industri Kreatif Tasikmalaya. Retrieved June 9, 2018, from https://galihsedayu.com/tag/industri-kreatif-tasikmalaya/
Sofyan, A.N., Sofianto, K., Sutirman, M., dan Suganda, D. (2018). Seni Kerajinan Kelom Geulis di Kota Tasikmalaya sebagai Pelengkap Fashion Wanita. Sosiohumaniora, Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 20(2), Juli: 132-137.
Somantri, R.A. (2015). Sistem Ekonomi Pengrajin Kelom Geulis di Gobras, Kota Tasikmalaya, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Patanjala, 7(3), September: 477-492. Retrieved March 22, 2019 from http://ejurnalpatanjala.kemdikbud.go.id/patanjala/index.php/patanjala/article/view/113/66.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tuti. (2018, May 8). Personal interview.
Vesela, D., Klimova, K. (2013). Knowledge-based Economy vs. Creative Economy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141: 413-417.
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82367378.pdf
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v35i1.4363
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.