Perilaku Komunikasi Perempuan dan Laki-Laki di Wilayah Rawan Bencana Gunung Api

Edi Puspito, Sumardjo Sumardjo, Titik Sumarti, Pudji Muljono

Abstract


Residents who live in volcanic regions, both men and women, have the risk of volcanic catastrophe. By obtain the latest information and understand the volcano disaster can reduce the risk.  Communication media with various advantages become an important means to access disaster information. The purpose of this study was to analyze men and women skills in the volcano disaster-prone areas in utilizing communication media and perceptions of resources. This research is a quantitative study by observation techniques.Conclusions of This study is the skill level of residents in the volcano disaster-prone areas are categorized as the low category, there is no difference in the frequency of radio, TV, and the Internet usage by citizens of both men and women, but differ in the use of HP and HT

Keywords


Communication, Behavior Men and women, the volcano disaster-prone areas

References


[BAPPENAS] Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional, [BNPB] Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. 2011. Rencana Aksi Rehabilitasi dan Rekonstruksi Pasca Bencana Erupsi Gunung Merapi Provinsi DI Yogyakarta dan Provinsi Jawa Tengah tahun 2011-2013. Jakarta [ID]: BAPPENAS, BNPB

Devito AJ. 2011. Komunikasi Antar Manusia. Banten [ID]: Kharisma.

Farlex 2000, http://www.thefreedictionary.com/amused. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.

Kim YC dan Kang J. 2010. Communication Neighbourhood Belonging and Houshold Hurricane Preparedness.New Jersey [US]: Blackwell Publishing.

Kiousis S. 1999. Public Trust or Mistrust?: Perception of Media Credibility in the Information Age. Austin [US]: University of Texas.

Littlejohn SW dan Foss KA. 2011. Teori Komunikasi Edisi 6. Jakarta [ID] Salemba Humanika.

McGhee PE 2014, Use Your Amuse System to Boost Your Immune System Humor Your Tumor. www.www.LaughterRemedy.com. Diunduh 1 April 2014

Notoatmodjo S. 2007. Promosi Kesehatan dan Ilmu Perilaku. Jakarta [ID] Rineka Cipta.

Quero RA. 2012. Reframing Coordination Challenges for Public-Provat Partnership in Disaster Preparedness. Manila [PH] Management and Organisation Department, De La Salle University, 2410 Taft Ave., Malate, Manila 1008.

Renn O. 2009. Risk Communication: Insight and Requiriment fo Designing Succesfull Communication Programs on Health and Environmental Hazards. Strategies for Overcoming Challenges to Effective Risk Communication. Robert L Heath, H Dan O’Hair. [US] Routledge. New York.

Renn O dan Levine D, 1991. Credibility and Trust in Risk Communication. RE Kasperson and PJM Stallen (edt.). Communication Risk to PubLic, 175-218. © 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the etherlands. http://elib.uni-stutgart.de/opus/volltexte/2010/5477/ pdf/ren67.pdf )

Rowan KE. 2009. 21th Century Communication, a Reference Handbook. Edited by William F. Eadie.Sage Publication.

Solso RL, Maclin OH, Macil MK, 2007. Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta [ID]: Penerbit Erlangga.

Springston JK.dkk. 2009. Influence Theories: Rethorical, Persuation, dan Information. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. Routledge, UK.

Vorderer P, 2011. It’s all entertainment—sure. But what exactly is entertainment? Communication research, media psychology, and the explanation of entertainment experiences Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Walgito B, 2003. Psikologi Sosial (Suatu Pengantar). Yogjakarta [ID]; Penerbit Andi.

Winkel WS, 2007. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta [ID]




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v30i1.455

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.