Socio-Economic And Divorce in Aceh Province

Afzal Afzal, Abd Jamal, Muhammad Nasir

Abstract


Socio-economic factors are always the benchmark of domestic life. There is an assumption that a household disharmony is caused by economic issues referred to as the highest number of divorce cases registered at Mahkamah Shari’a (Shari’s Court) of Aceh. This research is very important since Aceh is a special region in terms of religion and culture so that the number of divorces would not be this much and it is hoped that the government will issue a regulation that can reduce the number of divorces. The research data are obtained from BPS (the Central Bureau of Statistics) of Aceh Province and the Sharia Court of Aceh which then analyzed using descriptive quantitative methods. The results indicate that recur of friction (in a household) is the major cause of divorce in Aceh followed by the economic factor and domestic violence. The level of individuals’ education shows a significant influence on divorce along with the age when they first married, but children variable affected insignificantly. However, not all research in the same field has the same results as this study.


Keywords


divorce, sharia court, socio-economic

Full Text:

PDF

References


Act No. 3 of 2006 concerning the Religious Courts amended from Act No. 7 of 1989 concerning the Religious.

Apostolou, M. et al. (2016). Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of divorce, 99, 286–294.

Article 1 of Law Act No. 23 of 2004 about the eradication of Domestic Violence.

Article 38 of Law Act No. 1 of 1974 on marriage. Surabaya: Tinta Mas

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Aceh, (2011). Pedoman Pendataan Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional Tahun 2017. Banda Aceh: Badan Pusat Statistik

Büchler, A., & Schlatter, C. (2013). Marriage Age in Islamic and Contemporary Muslim Family Laws A Comparative Survey by Andrea Büchler and Christina Schlatter, 1.

Cavapozzi, D., Fiore, S., & Pasini, G. (2019). Divorce and well-being. Disentangling the role of stress and socioeconomic status. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 100–212.

García, A. M. (2014). Divorce and abuse in 16th, 17th and 18th century Spain. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 161, 184–194.

Harahap, T. H. (2015). Fenomena Kasus Cerai Gugat (Studi Kasus di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Tapaktuan), 1 (2), 39–49.

Ihsan, F. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Kependidikan. Bandung: Rineka Cipta Press

Jalovaara, M. (2003). The joint effects of marriage partners’ socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography, 40 (1), 67–81.

Jalovaara, M. (2010). Socio-economic status and divorce in first marriages in Finland 1991-93.

Härkönen, J. (2013). Divorce : Trends, Patterns, Causes, Consequences.

Kabalmay, H. A. (2015). Kebutuhan Ekonomi Dan Kaitannya Dengan Perceraian (Studi Atas Cerai Gugat Di Pengadilan Agama Ambon), xi, 47–67.

Karlina, E., Arif, M., & Sodikin. (2017). Pengaruh bekerja di luar negeri terhadap tingkat ekonomi dan perceraian. Social Science Education Journal, 4(1), 54–60.

Lampard, R. (2013). Age at marriage and the risk of divorce in England and Wales, 29 (July), 167–202.

Mahkamah Syar’iyah Aceh, (2017). Data perceraian kabupaten/kota Provinsi Aceh.

Mandemakers, J. J., & Kalmijn, M. (2014). Do mother’s and father’s education condition the impact of parental divorce on child well-being?. 44, 187–199.

Marinescu, I. (2016). Divorce: what does learning have to do with it? Labour Economics.

Matondang, A. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang Mengakibatkan Perceraian dalam Perkawinan. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan dan Sosial Politik, 2 (2), 141–150.

Prianto, B., Wulandari, N. W., & Rahmawati, A. (2013). Rendahnya Komitmen Dalam Perkawinan Sebagai Sebab Perceraian. Jurnal Komunitas, 5 (62), 208–218.

Rais, I. (2014). Tingginya Angka Cerai Gugat (Khulu’) Di Indonesia; Analisis Kritis Terhadap Penyebab Dan Alternatif Solusi Mengatasinya, 191–204.

Raz-yurovich, L. (2011). Economic Determinants of Divorce among Dual- Earner Couples : Jews in Israel, 49 (0).

Rodgers, Boyce, K. & Rose, Hillary A. (2002). Risk and Resiliency Factors Among Adolescent Who Experience Marital Transition. Journal of Marriage and Family. Vol. 64,1024-1037.

Sakata, K., & Mckenzie, C. R. (2009). The impact of divorce precedents on the Japanese divorce rate. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79, 2917–2926.

Sakata, K., & Mckenzie, C. R. (2011). Social security and divorce in Japan. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 81(7), 1507–1517.

Sandström, G. (2011). Socio-economic determinants of divorce in early twentieth-century Sweden. History of the Family, 16 (3), 292–307.

Soekanto, S. (2007). Sosiologi suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Subekti (1985). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata, Jakarta: Intermasa.

Sudarsono (1994) Hukum Perkawinan Nasional, Jakarta: PT. Rinekacipta.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Afabeta

Sulaiman. (2012). Dominasi Tradisi Dalam Perkawinan Di BawahUmur, 19, 15–26.

Syahnur, S., Ilham, R., & Munawar, E. (2017). The Correlation of Information and Counseling Sources for Students with Maturing Marriage Age (MMA), Indonesia, 4 (3).

Tamborini, C. R., Couch, K. A., & Reznik, G. L. (2015). Long-term impact of divorce on women ’ s earnings across multiple divorce windows : A life course perspective. Advances in Life Course Research.

Thalib, A. & Lestari, M. (2017). Tingginya Tingkat Gugat Cerai Di Pengadilan Agama Pekanbaru, Xvii(1).

Widyastuti, R. (2009). Peran Hukum dalam Memberikan Perlindungan terhadap Perempuan dari Tindak Kekerasan di Era Globalisasi, Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, FH UGM, Yogyakarta. Hal. 395.

Zuzana, Ž. & Kreidl, M. (2018). Grandparenting after divorce : Variations across countries, 38 (January 2017), 61–71.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v35i2.5021

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.