Pereduksian Rasionalitas dan Fungsi Rasionalitas Emotif dalam Teori Pilihan Rasional pada Kajian Ekonomi Hukum
Abstract
The mental block of behavioral approach when implemented rational choice theory in economic law studies is actually reflection of its unrealistic core assumption: that people subject to law act rationally. That assumption or postulate is deductively elaborated into crudely conception of economic and psychological, and it is nothing else but necessarily to hold their paradigms that reasoned out the human frame of reference in an incentive-disincentive mechanism or the stimuli-respond design. No doubt the results of research that insisted arbitrary concepts and ignored inductive method would be artificial and partial nature, and essential dehumanization, or that research based on economy or psychology concept alone is not sufficient to accout for legal behaviour processes. Hence, legal economic scholars should established analysis the mind and act linkage through thick description, for example, by followed anthropology discipline has commited to holistic explanation, look at the people’s entity as it is in realities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Allen, Tom, et.al, “Computer Simulation of Judicial Behavior,” (electronic version) dalam Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, http://papers.ssrn.com/so14/papers.cfm?_id=547072 9 Februari,
Bandes, Susan A, “Emphaty, Narrative, and Victim Impact statements,” dalam Chicago University Law Review, Vol. 63, 1999.
Blaug, Mark, The Methodology of Economics, or How Economic Explain. New York, Sage Publications. 1992.
Blumental, Jeremy A, “Law and the Emotion: The Problem of Affective Forecasting,” dalam Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 80, 2005.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Outline of a Theory of Practice. London, Cambridge University Press, 1977.
Capra, Fritjop, The Webs of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. London, Flamingo, 1997.
Chapman, Bruce,”Legal Analysis of Economics: Solving the Problem of Rational Commitment,” dalam Chicago-Kent Law Review . Vol. 79. 2004.
Clore, Gerald L, “For Love or Money: Some Emotional Foundations of rationality,” dalam Chicago-Kent law Review. Vol. 80. 2005.
Dailey, Anne C, “The Hidden Economy of the Unconscious,” dalam Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 74, 2000.
------, “ Holmes and the Romatic Mind,” dalam Duke law Journal. Vol. 48, 1998.
D’Arms, Justin, “Emphaty and Evaluatif Inquiry,” dalam Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 74. 2000.
Elicson, Robert C, “Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbours in Shasta County,“ dalam Stanford Law Review. Vol. 38, 1986.
Elster, J, The Cement of Society. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1989.
Ember, Carol M. dan Melvin Ember, Anthropology. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J, Prentice Hall. Inc, 1985.
Feldman, Heidi Li, “Foreword: Law, Psychology, and the Emotion,” dalam Chicago-Kent law Review. Vol. 74. 2000.
Frank, Robert H, Passion within Reasons: The Strategic Role of the Emotions, Boston Little Brown, 1988.
Giddens, Anthony, The Construction of Society: Outline of the Theory Structuration, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1984.
Haberlandt, Karl, Cognitive Psychology. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publication, 1994.
Hill, Claire A, “Law and economics in the Personal Sphere.’ dalam Law and Social Inquiry. Vol. 29. No. 1. 2004.
Hillman, Robert A, “The Limits of behavioral Design Theory in Legal Analysis,” dalam Working Paper – Cornell Law School. 2000. http://www.law.cornell.edu/paper, 5 Juli, 2000.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, “Law in Science and Science in Law,” dalam Harvard Law Review. Vol.12. 1899.
Homans, George, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. London, Routledge, 1961.
Jolls, Christine, et.al. “A Behavioral Approach to law and Economics,” dalam Stanford Law Review. Vol. 50. 1998.
Kahan, Dan M and Martha C. Nussbaum,” Two Conceptions of Emotions in Criminal Law,” dalam Columbia Law Review. Vol. 96,1996.
Kelman, Mark, “Behavioral Economics as part of a Rhetorical Duet: A response to Joll, Sunstein, and Thaler”, dalam Stanford Law Review. Vol. 50, 1998.
Korobkin, Russel B, “A Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form ,” dalam Oregon law Review. No. 1, Vol. 79.
Korobkin, Russell B and Thomas S. Ulen, “Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from law and Economics,” dalam California Law Review. Vol. 88. 2000.
McAdams, Richard, “Cooperation and Conflict: The Economics of Group Status Production and Race Discrimination”, dalam Harvard Law Review. Vol. 108. 1995.
Parsons, Talcott, The Social System. New York, The Free Press, 1951.
Posner, Eric A, “Law and the Emotions,” dalam Georgia Law Journal. Vol. 89, 2001.
Posner, Richard A, Economic Analysis of Law. Boston, Little Brown, 1998.
------ “Values and Consequences: an Introduction to Economic Analysis of Law,” dalam Chicago Economic Working paper. No. 53. 1998.
Rahardjo, Satjipto, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir: Catatan Kritis tentang Pergulatan Manusia dan Hukum. Jakarta, Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2007.
Reed, Stephen K, Cognition: Theory and Application. New York, Sage Foundation, 1988.
Rubin, Edward L, “Rational Choice and Rat Choice: Some Thoughts on the Relationship among Rationality, Market, and Human Beings”, dalam Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 80. 2005.
Safran, Jeremy D. and Leslie S. Greenberg, “Affect and the Unconsciousness: a Cognitive Perspective,” dalam Raphael Stern (ed), Theories of the Unconsciousness and Theories of the Self. New York. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publisher. 1987.
Schroeder, Jeanne L, “Just So Stories: Posnerian Methodology,” dalam Cardozo law Review. Vol. 22. 2001.
------, “Economic Rationality in Law and Economics Scholarships,” dalam Working Paper- Cardozo law School. No. 021, 2000.
Scott, John, “Rational Choice Theory, dalam G. Browning. et.al. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. New York. Sage Publication. 2000. (electronic version).
http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk~scottj/ , 8 November 2000.
Shaibani, Sahand, “Psychodynamic of the Judicial Process,” dalam Stanford Journal of Legal Studies. Vol. 1:1. 2002.
Sunstein, Cass R., et.al, “Predictably Incoherent Judgments,” dalam Chicago law & Economic Working Paper. No. 131, 2001.
Sunstein, Cass R, “Behavioral Analysis of Law”, dalam Chicago-Kent Law Review. Vol. 64. 1997.
Ulen, Thomas S, “The Unexpected Guest: Law and Economics, law and other Cognate Disciplines, and the Future of Legal Scholarship,” dalam Chicago- Kent Law Review. Vol. 79. 2004.
Weber, Max, Economy and Society: an Outline Interpretative Sociology. (Guenther Roth & Clauss Wittich. Eds). New York, Beidmester, 1978.
-----Law in Economic and Society. (Edward Shill Max Rheinstein. tld). New York, Simon and Schuter, 1954.
Wilson, Edward O, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York, Alferd A Knopf, 1998.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v13i2.656
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN 2086-5449 EISSN 2549-6751
.jpg){kind=logo}
