PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARIAH MENJADI KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOM0R 93/PUU-X/2012

Redi Hadiyanto

Abstract


ABSTRACT

This research is motivated by the phenomenon of the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement which could initially be resolved in a religious court also in the general court. There is no legal certainty. While the legal certainty of each citizen is guaranteed and regulated in the 1945 constitution article 28D paragraph (1), in that article states that the state guarantees the legal certainty of each citizen. The purpose of this study is to understand about the elimination of the explanation of article 55 paragraph 2 of law number 21 years, to reassure the certainty of the law, then law number 21 of 2008 must be tested materially to the Constitutional Court to guarantee the legal certainty of every citizen. The method used in this research is content analysis, namely analyzing the Constitutional Court Decision Number 93 / PUU-X / 2012. In addition, this research also uses sociological and normative-juridical approach. The results showed that the Constitutional Court granted the material test petition submitted by the petitioners, with the result of Constitutional Court decision number 93 / PUU-X / 2012, that the explanation of article 55 paragraph 2 of law number 21 of 2008 was abolished because it did not guarantee the legal certainty of every citizen country. So that after the ruling of the constitutional court is ratified, the Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement case becomes the absolute authority of the religious court, it cannot be processed and decided outside the religious court.

Keywords: Sharia Economic Dispute Settlement, Religious Courts

 


Keywords


Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah, Pengadilan Agama

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anshori, A. G. (2007) Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia, Cet I. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Abdullah, A. G. (2009). Solusi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Menurut Pasal 49 UU No. 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan Atas UU No. 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama dan Pasal 55 UU No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah, MakalahSeminar Nasional Undang-Undang No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Perbankan Syariah. Yogyakarta: Kampus Terpadu UII.

Antonio, M. S. (2001) Bank Syariah Dari Teori Ke Praktek. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.

Echlos, John M dan Shadily, Hasan. (1996) Kamus Inggris Indonesia Dan Indonesia Inggris. Jakarta: Gramedia.

J.Melong, L.(1999). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya), dan Husain Usman dan Purnomo Setiady Akbar. cet. ke-3 (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaam. (1990) Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia . Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Koentjaraningrat. (1982). Kebudayaan Metaliteit dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Putusan MK RI Nomor Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012

Pengujian UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2008 Perkara Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012

Suadi, A. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.(Suarabaya,: Kencana)

Soemitro, A. (2019). Hukum Ekonomi Syariah dan Fiqh Muamalah di Lembaga Keuangan dan Bisnis Kontemporer. Jakarta : Prenada Media.

Tim Penyusun. (2010). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI.

Undang-Undang Dasar 1945




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v3i1.5644

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Statistik Counter:

Web Analytics View My Stats Flag Counter

 

Editorial Office:

Syariah Faculty, Universitas Islam Bandung

Jalan Taman sari No. 24-26 Bandung