Simbol-Simbol dalam Komunikasi Keluarga Beda Agama
Abstract
This article is one of the research having the plurality of cultural ethnic and
religion background. The religion identity is an important dimension for all societies.
The goal of the article is to analyze the role of interpersonal communication in a family
with different religion, analyze the meaning of symbols in an interaction within the
family with different religion, analyze the supporting and restricting communication
factors in a family with different religion. Several perspectives were used as theoretical
framewaork, i.e Phenomenology, and Cross Cultural Communication. This reseach
employed in-depth interview and observation as data collecting technique.The role of
interpersonal communication in a family with different religion cannot be separated from
initiation, experiment, intensification, integrity, bond and the role of communication
effectiveness such as supportiveness, empathy, objectiveness and equality. The meaning
of communication symbols in a family with different religion is due to language, rituals,
national days, food, and dress. The supporting factors are respect each other, protect,
tolerance, cooperation, and mutual cooperation. Whereas the restricting factors of
interpersonal communication in a family with different religion, are avoiding the dialogue
about faith, freedom, and religion education for children.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Abraham, Francis M. 1982, Modern Sociological Theory (An Introduction). Oxford:Oxford University Press. Chapter 8. Simbolic Interacsionism.
Apandi, Idris. 2015. Revolusi Karakter, Fajar Media, Bandung
Indriyani. 2006. Skripsi: Hubungan Antara Komunikasi Orang Tua dan Anak dengan Rasa Percaya Diri Remaja Putri Awal, Fakultas Psikologi Salatiga, Yogyakarta.
Jeanny Maria Fatimah. (2014). “Komunikasi Keluarga Meningkatkan Ases Pendidikan bagi Kesetaraan Anak Perempuan dalam Lingkaran kemiskinan”, MImbar Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan UNISBA, Vol 30, N0. 2, pp127-270.
Jandt, Fred E. 2004, An Introduction to Intercultural Communication, Identities in a Global Community, Fourth Edition, Sage Publication, California.
KJ Veeger. 1985, Realitas Sosial, Refleksi Filsafat Sosial atas Hubungan Individu – Masyarakat dalam Cakrawala Sejarah Sosiologi. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kahmad, dadang. 2009. Sosiologi Agama, Rosda Karya, Bandung
Kurniati, Nia. 2001, Tesis: Pengaruh Karakteristik Sosiodemografi dan Jarak Sosial terhadap Efektivitas Komunikasi Antaretnik, PPS, UNPAD
Mulyana, Deddy. 2001, Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi, Rosda Karya, Bandung.
Mulyana, Deddy. 2010, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu sosial, Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Masykur, Ali. 2005, Artikel Ilmiah, tentang Pola Komunikasi Antar Umat Beragama, IAIN Sultan Maulana Hasanuddin, Banten.
Martin, N. Judith dan Nakayama, Thomas K. 2004, Intercultural Communication in Contex, Third Edition, New York, America.
Soeprapto, Ryadi. 2000. Interaksionisme Simbolik, Perspektif Sosiologi Modern. Malang: Averroes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Soeprapto, Riyadi. 2001. Interaksionisme Simbolik Perspektif Sosiologi Modern. Yogyakarta: Averroes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Samovar. A.Larry dkk. 2010, Komunikasi Lintas Budaya, edisi 7, Jakarta, Salemba Humaniora
Sugiono. 2012, Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alpabeta.
Turner. S Bryan. 2012, Relasi Agama dan Teori Sosial Komtemporer, Yoyakarta, IRCiSod
Virgini, Immanuel, Olaga Natalia. 2007, Model Komunikasi Antarbudaya Ekspatriat Guangdong Machinery Exp. Imp. Ltd. China (Gmc) Dengan Orang Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menjalin Kerjasama Dengan Orang Indonesia Di Surabaya, Jurnal Ilmiah SCRIPTURA ISSN 1978-385X Vol. I No.1 Januari 200, h. 67.
Sumber Lain:
Koran Kompas 28/5/2009.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v31i2.1495
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.