Evaluation of Satisfaction in Research and Community Service in University

Atie Rachmiatie, Firmansyah Firmansyah, Raditya Pratama, Ferra Martian

Abstract


The evaluation of research and community service management in university is carried out institutionally. Indicators in national higher education standards need to be reviewed annually. The object of this research is the LPPM of the Universitas Islam Bandung (Unisba), using a quantitative approach with a survey method. Primary data were collected through questionnaires to the partner population through cluster sampling, internal samples of 191 and external samples of 87. Data analysis was descriptive with parametric statistical tests as descriptions on a Likert scale with eight sub-indicators of a satisfaction survey. Secondary data was collected through focus group discussions on internal and external stakeholders. The results showed that most of the respondents were satisfied with the management of research and community service managed by LPPM Unisba. However, there are suggestions that can be made, including third-party funding, research based on community needs, and conducting ongoing evaluations.


Keywords


Survey; Satisfaction; Research; Community Service.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Suryana S. Peran perguruan tinggi dalam pemberdayaan masyarakat. Pendidik Rabbani [Internet]. 2018;2(2):368–79. Available from: https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/rabbani/article/view/1443

Sri Y. Kajian implementasi tri dharma perguruan tinggi sebagai fenomena pendidikan tinggi di Indonesia. Widya. 2012;29(318):28–

Devica S. Penyuluhan Tentang Peluang Dan Tantangan Penerapan Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Penyul Tentang Peluang Dan Tantangan Penerapan Tri Dharma Perguru Tinggi Di Era Revolusi Ind 40. 2015;7(9):27–44.

Lian B. Tanggung Jawab Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi Menjawab Kebutuhan Masyarakat. Pros Semin Nas Pendidik Progr Pascasarj Univ PGRI Palembang. 2019;2:999–1015.

Fathurrahman & Muhtarom A. Pengaruh Pembinaan Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi terhadap Perilaku Dosen Sebagai Sumber Daya Manusia Pendidikan. J Kaji Teor dan Prakt Kependidikan. 2019;4(1):45–8.

Madiawati PN, Pradana M, Sulistijono S. The Importance of Organizational Commitments and Performance: Studies of Corporate University in West Java. Mimb J Sos dan Pembang. 2020;36(2):334–41.

Nafilatur Rohmah, Muhammad Huda A.Y K. Strategi Peningkatan Kemampuan Dosen dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah ( Studi Multi Kasus pada UNISDA dan STAIDRA di Kabupaten Lamongan). J Pendidik. 2016;1(7):1312–22.

Yulianto H. Peningkatan Partisipasi Riset Bagi Dosen. CARADDE J Pengabdi Kpd Masy. 2018;1(1):23–9.

Ardianingsih A, Yunitarini S. Etika, Profesi Dosen Dan Perguruan Tinggi: Sebuah Kajian Konseptual. J Ekon dan Bisnis. 2012;10:38–46.

Muhardi, Nurcahyono A. Pengaruh Tunjangan Sertifikasi terhadap Produktivitas Dosen dalam Menghasilkan Karya Ilmiah dan Penelitian. SNAPP 2011 Sos Ekon , Hum. 2011;99–106.

Kemenristekdikti. Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Edisi XIII. 13th ed. Dimyati M, editor. Jakarta: Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, Deputi Bidang Penguatan Riset dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi / Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional; 2020. 187 p.

Unisba L. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. 2019. 141 p.

Casey C. Critical Analysis of Organizations. 2002;1–212.

Robbins S, Timothy A. Judge. Organizational Behavior. 2012. 3 p.

Akbar K, Hamdi H, Kamarudin L, Fahruddin F. Manajemen POAC pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi Kasus BDR di SMP Negeri 2 Praya Barat Daya). J Kependidikan J Has Penelit dan Kaji Kepustakaan di Bid Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. 2021;7(1):167.

Kamuli S. Evaluasi ttg implementasi kebijakan pengembangan kawasan minapolitan.

Ningrum E. Evaluation of Learning System on Teacher Educational Profession Programs. 2019;34(2):367–77. Available from: https://ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/3668/pdf

Cunningham JB. Approaches to the Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness. Acad Manag Rev. 1977;2(3):463–74.

Sumual TE. Pengaruh Kompetensi Kepemimpinan, Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Universitas Negeri Manado. MIMBAR, J Sos dan Pembang. 2015;31(1):71.

Husaini A. PERANAN MANAJEMEN SUMBERDAYA MANUSIA DALAM ORGANISASI. J War [Internet]. 2017;4:9–15. Available from: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/290763-peranan-manajemen-sumberdaya-manusia-dal-3cb59c90.pdf

Polese F, Troisi O, Torre C, Maione G. Performance Evaluation and Measurement in Public Organizations : A Performance Evaluation and Measurement in Public Organizations : A Systematic Literature Review. 2017;(January).

Zong F, Wang L. Evaluation of university scientific research ability based on the output of sci-tech papers: A D-AHP approach. PLoS One. 2017;12(2).

Tandika D. Pengukuran kinerja fakultas mipa dan fakultas psikologi di universitas islam bandung : pendekatan. J Terakreditasi DIKTI [Internet]. 2006;XXII(2):164–83. Available from: ejournal.unisba.ac.id/index.php/mimbar/article/view/207#.VZdOjhuqqko

Sufiyanti E, Sayutu AJ, Windarti AO. Tingkat Kepuasan Konsumen Terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Minimarket. J Ris Bisnis dan Investasi. 2017;3(1):43.

Irawan A, Komara EF. Pengukuran Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat Terhadap Pelayanan Pemerintahan Kecamatan Katapang Kabupaten Bandung. J Inspirasi Bisnis dan Manaj. 2017;1(2):123.

Handono FW, Nurdin H, Sumarna S. Tingkat Kepuasan Pelanggan terhadap Kualitas Pelayanan Pada CV Jia Pradana dengan Metode Servqual. J Sist dan Teknol Inf. 2019;7(3):154.

Afrioza S, Baidillah I. HUBUNGAN TINGKAT KEPUASAN PASIEN TERHADAP PELAYANAN KESEHATAN DI PUSKESMAS SEPATAN Selvy. 2021;01(02):169–80.

Jo H. Examining the key factors in fl uencing loyalty and satisfaction toward the smart factory. 2022;(September 2021).

Badrtdinov NN, Gorobets D V. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Management Development Institutions of Higher Education on the Basis of the Factor and Criterion Model. 2016;11(18):12167–82.

Apuke OD. Quantitative Research Methods : A Synopsis Approach. Kuwait Chapter Arab J Bus Manag Rev. 2017;6(11):40–7.

John Creswell. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach. Intercultural Education. SAGE Publications; 2009. 79 p.

Leavy P. Research Design - Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Art Based, and Community Based Participatory Research Approach. New York,: Guilfold Press; 2017. 7 p.

Uchechi HO. Parametric and Nonparametric Statistics. SAGE Res Methods Found. 2020;(July).

Djamba YK, Neuman WL. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Vol. 30, Teaching Sociology. 2002. 380 p.

Joshi A, Kale S, Chandel S, Pal D. Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. Br J Appl Sci Technol. 2015;7(4):396–403.

Akhtar MI. Research design Research design. Res Soc Sci Interdiscip Perspect. 2016;(September):68–84.

Then KL, Rankin JA, Ali E. Focus group research: what is it and how can it be used? Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014;24(1):16–22.

Freitas H, Oliveira M, Jenkins M, Popjoy O. The Focus Group, A Qualitative Research Method. Isrc. 1998;(010298):1–22.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v0i0.8357

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial dan Pembangunan is licensed under  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.