Pelaksanaan Mediasi Menurut PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 Berikut Permasalahannya
Abstract
In essence, every subject of law both individual and legal entity wants to life peacefully without any dispute with any other member of community. However, the dispute could not be avoided in certain circumstances, so that it has to be settled before a court. It is generally kwown that a dispute settled through the court conventionally is very slow and complicated. For this reason, it is necessary for Supreme Court to optimize a peaceful method as set out in Article 130 of HIR or Article 154 of RBG. Such method known as settlement of dispute through mediation as regulated by the Supreme Court Regulation No.1 of 2008. Under the Regulation, principal the parties are obliged to present in mediation. They are given the opportunity to resolve their dispute by mediation out of court to be affirmed. If the expression of a party’s consent to be bound by an agreement has been procured through the coercion, error or fraud of its representative by another Party, the Party must submit a new claim for the purpose of agreement cancelation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Abdurrahman, Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Mediasi Pengadilan Dan Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, dalam Refleksi Dinamika Hukum, Rangkaian Pemikiran Dalam Dekade Terakhir, Analisis Komprehensif Tentang Hukum Oleh 63 Akademisi dan Praktisi Hukum, Perum Percetakan Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, Cet ke-1, 2008.
Garner, A (ed.) Bryan, s Dictionary Black, , West -Thompson, 2004.
Harahap Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, Cet ke-5, 2007.
Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH. Perdata).
Mahkamah Agung R.I., Laporan Tahunan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009, Varia Peradilan Majalah Hukum, Tahun XXV, Nomor 293, April 2010.
Manan Bagir, Suatu Tinjauan Terhadap Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004, Mahkamah Agung RI, 2005.
Mertokusumo Sudikno, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta, Cet ke-2, 1979.
Mufidi M. Faiz, Analisis Terhadap Metoda-Metoda Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Menurut Undan-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 199 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Artikel dalam Syiar Madani Jurnal Hukum, Volume VII Nomor 3, Nopember 2005.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2008.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v13i2.655
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. ISSN 2086-5449 EISSN 2549-6751