TAXONOMY OF LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Abstract
Taxonomy of Learning Objectives is a concept used to describe a hierarchical structure in understanding learning objectives. This concept divides the learning objectives into different levels, which include knowledge, understanding, application, analysis, evaluation, and creation. The importance of the taxonomy of learning objectives in supporting an effective learning process. This taxonomy provides a structured framework for developing curricula, designing learning experiences, and evaluating student achievement. The purpose of this study To formulate training objectives, the use of a Training Taxonomy is necessary. Taxonomy is a tool that classifies and shows the relationship between various elements. One form of taxonomy is used to determine learning objectives and consider learning outcomes. As such, this abstract highlights the importance of a taxonomy of learning objectives in helping achieve effective learning and comprehensive cognitive development for students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agarwal, P. K. (2018). Retrieval Practice & Bloom ’ s Taxonomy : Do Students Need Fact Knowledge Before. Journal of Educational Psychology.
Ari Widodo. (2005). Taksonomi tujuan pembelajaran, didaktis. 4 (2)(2), 61.
Arifin, S. (2009). Taksonomi Tujuan Pembelajaran. P3AI.
Darmalaksana, W. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Studi Pustaka dan Studi Lapangan. Pre-Print Digital Library UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 1–6.
Fauzi, A. (2017). Daya Serap Siswa Terhadap Pembelajaran Taksonomi Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jurnal Pusaka, 1(8), 50–67.
Gunawan, I., & Paluti, A. R. (2017). Taksonomi Bloom – Revisi Ranah Kognitif. E-Journal.Unipma, 7(1), 1–8.
Kartikasari, M., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Usodo, B. (2016). Kreativitas Guru SMA dalam Menyusun Soal Ranah Kognitif Ditinjau dari Pengalaman Kerja. Prosiding Seminar Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, November, 431–442. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id
Magdalena, I., Fajriyati Islami, N., Rasid, E. A., & Diasty, N. T. (2020). Tiga Ranah Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Pendidikan. EDISI : Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains, 2(1), 132–139.
Mariati, M. (2018). Penerapan Alat Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bertingkat Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Mahasiswa. Liabilities (Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi), 1(2), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.30596/liabilities.v1i2.2328
Muradi, A., Mubarak, F., Darmawaty, R., & Hakim, A. R. (2020). Higher Order Thinking Skills Dalam Kompetensi Dasar Bahasa Arab. Arabi : Journal of Arabic Studies, 5(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.24865/ajas.v5i2.293
Murtiyasa, B., & Sari, N. K. P. M. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Pada Materi Bilangan Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(3), 2059. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i3.5737
Nurmawati. (2016). buku Evaluasi Pendidikan.pdf (p. 205). Ciptapustaka Media.
Pane, A., & Darwis Dasopang, M. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 343. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Ridwan. (2018). Pendidikan Islam Dan Teknologi Digital Serta Efektivitasnya Dalam Mendukung Teory Taxonomy Bloom. Fikrotuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Manajemen Islam, 7(1), 834–854.
Ruwaida, H. (2019). Proses Kognitif Dalam Taksonomi Bloom Revisi: Analisis Kemampuan Mencipta (C6) Pada Pembelajaran Fikih. Jurnal.Stiq-Amuntai.Ac.Id, 4(1), 51–76.
Selvia A.H, S., Yensy, N. A., & Susanto, E. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Soal pada Buku Mandiri Matematika Terbitan Erlangga Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. FARABI: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.47662/farabi.v5i1.306
Shodiq, S. F. (2019). Revival Tujuan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (Pai) Di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. At-Tajdid : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 2(02), 218. https://doi.org/10.24127/att.v2i02.870
Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy, Backward Design, and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development in Crafting Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 158. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9252
Sutjipto, S. (2016). Pentingnya Pelatihan Kurikulum 2013 Bagi Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1(2), 235–260. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v1i2.771
Wijayanti, T. (2016). Keefektifan Pendekatan CTL dan Problem Solving Ditinjau dari Prestasi Belajar Matematika dan Religiusitas Siswa. Keefektifan Pendekatan CTL Dan Problem Solving Ditinjau Dari Prestasi Belajar Matematika Dan Religiusitas Siswa, 8(2), 213–223.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/tjpi.v12i1.11927
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office:
Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Bandung.
Jln. Tamansari No. 24-26 - Lt. 2 Tel. 022-4203368 Ext. 7301-7302-7385 Fax - 4201897 Bandung 40116 - Phone/WhatsApp: 0878-2048-5914
Ta’dib : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.