Interaksi Simbolik: Suatu Pengantar

Dadi Ahmadi

Abstract


Symbolic interaction focuses on ‘interpretation’ over subjective meaning derived from interaction of people with the others of his/her environment. As stated clearly in its name, symbolic interaction emphasized a close relationship an exchange between symbol and interaction. These exchanges produced special meanings and interpretations, unique for each person involved. Symbolic is derived from the word ‘symbol’ which means signs resulted from consensus. Symbolic Interaction tried to ‘entering’ meaning process and subject defining by employing participant observation to watch carefully how subject define themselves and their actions respectfully, based on definitions and meanings given by others in their environment.

Keywords


interaksi, simbol, interaksi simbolik, interpretasi

References


Bachtiar, Wardi. 2006. Sosiologi Klasik. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Basrowi dan Sukidin. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Perspektif Mikro. Surabaya: Insan Cendekia

Becker, Howard. 1963. Overview of Labelling Theories, www. Hewett, Norfolk. Sch.uk/curric/soc/crime/labelling/ diakses pada 10 Agustus 2008.

Charon, Joel M. 1979. Symbolic Interactionism, United States of America: Prentice Hall Inc

Fisher, B. Aubrey. 1986. Teori-teori Komunikasi: Perspektif Mekanistis, Psikologis, Interaksional, dan Pragmatis. Penterjemah Soejono Trimo, Penyunting Jalaluddin Rakhmat. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Francis M. Abraham. 1982 Modern Sociological Theory (An Introduction). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chapter 8. Simbolic Interacsionism.

Goffman, Erving, 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Harmondsworth, Penguin

Griffin, Emory A. 2004. A First Look At Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Horton, Paul B dan Chester L. Hunt. 1984. Sociology. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

http://bambangsukmawijaya.wordpress.com/ 2007/12/07/fenomenologi-dan-interaksisimbolik/ diakses pada 25 Desember 2008 pkl. 08.10

http://teorikomunikasi-umy.blogspot.com/2005/0 9 / t e o r i - t e n t a n g - i n t e r a k s i -simbolik_13.html, diakses pada 25 Desember 2008 pkl. 08.10

h t t p ://www. p o n t i a n a k p o s t . c o m / b e r i t a /index.asp?Berita=Opini&id=95576, diakses pada 28 Desember, 12.00

http://averroes.or.id/2007/12/12/teoriinteraksionisme-simbolik/ diakses pada 28 Desember,12.00

http://fisip.untirta.ac.id/teguh/?p=17 diakses pada 28 Desember, 12.00

http://jejakelana.blog.com/355151/ diakses pada 28 Desember, 12.00

http://sobek.colorado.edu/SOC/SI/sitableofcontents.htm

http://www.colorado.edu/Communication/meta_discourses/Papers/App_Papers/Nelson.htm

Littlejohn, Stephen, W. 2004. Theories of Human Communication. (edisi ketujuh). Belmont: Thomson Learning. Hal. 144-162 New York, USA: Artists Right Society (ARS).

Mulyana, Deddy. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy. 1999. Nuansa-Nuansa Komunikasi, Meneropong Politik dan

Mulyana, Deddy. Budaya Komunikasi Masyarakat Kontemporer. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy. 2000. Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar, Bandung: Remadja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy dan Rakhmat, Jalaluddin, 1998. Komunikasi Antarbudaya, Bandung: Remadja Rosdakarya.

Miller, Katherine, 2005. Communication Theories, Perspectives, Process, and Contexts, Second Edition, Singapore: McGraw-Hill International Edition Rosdakarya.

Makyun Subuki, 15 November 2006, Komunikasi dalam Teori Interaksionisme Simbolis, Strukturasi, dan Konvergensi http://tulisanmakyun.blogspot.com /2008/02/teori-komunikasi_29.html

Moleong, Lexy J, 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nelson. D. Lindsey. 1998. Herbert Blumer’s Symbolic Interactionism. University of Colorado at Boulder Spring. http://www.colorado.edu/Communication /metadiscourses/Papers/App_Papers/Nelson.htm diakses pada 05 Januari 2009 pkl. 09.00

Rahmat, Jalaluddin. 1995. Metode Penelitian Komunikasi, Bandung: Remadja Rosdakarya

Rahim, A. Samsudin. 2006. Kumpulan Esei Isu-Isu Komunikasi. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Ampang Press Sdn Berhad.

Soeprapto, Riyadi. 2002. Interaksi Simbolik, Perspektif Sosiologi Modern. Yogyakarta: Averrpes Press dan Pustaka Pelajar.

The Society for More Creative Speech. (1996). Symbolic Interactionism as Defined by Herbert Blumer. http://www.thepoint.net/-usul/text/blumer.html

Uchjana, Onong E. 2003. Ilmu, Teori dan Filsafat Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Veeger. KJ . 1993. Realitas Sosial, Refleksi Filsafat Sosial atas Hubungan Individu–Masyarakat dalam Cakrawala Sejarah Sosiologi. Jakarta: Gramedia. Hlm 224 – 226.

Wood, JT. 2000. Communication Theories in Action. Calofornia: Belmont

West. Richard dan Turner.H.Lynn. 2008. Pengantar Teori Komunikasi, Analisis dan Aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i2.1115

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


 

   

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License