Roles Mapping in Tribal Conflict Reconciliation: A Study of West Kalimantan Dayak and Madurese Case

Ira Mirawati

Abstract


The Tribal conflict between Dayak and Madurese of West Kalimantan in 1996 – 2000 causing their communication had totally broken for many years. In 2002, they began to communicate. Until now, they still improve their communication quality. It is important to know how they conduct this reconciliation communication after all of their conflict. This research investigates people roles in the reconciliation communication between Dayak and Madurese in Kabupaten Bengkayang, West Kalimantan. Researcher using in-depth interview, observation, and literature study in this Phenomenology research. Nineteen informants were chosen purposively. They are both Dayak and Madurese, people from other tribe, police, and government officer. The result shows there are four roles in this communication; they are Dayaknese and Madurese as the main actor or performer, the guarantor as a mediator, the police officer and local government officer as an advisor, and other ethnics as colleagues. Madurese needs guarantor to ensure their live. Dayak and Madurese need an advisor when they facing a problem. Both of them also need other ethnics as colleagues to smooth communication. All of them played a role dramaturgically in positive purposes, as a personal or as a team member.

Keywords


role mapping, reconciliation, tribal conflict, dayaknese madurese, dramaturgy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alexandra, F. (2014). Analisis Efektifitas Resolusi Konflik Sampit Pada Tahun 2001. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Arkanuddin. (2005 ). Menelusuri Akar Konflik Antaretnik di Kalimantan Barat. Mediator Vol 7 No 2, 185-195.

Barnlund, D. C. (1970). Language Behavior:A Book Of Readings In Communication. The Hague: Mouton.

Bloomfield, David & Barnes, T. (2003). Reconciliation After Violence Conflict: A Handbook, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Cresswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Tradition. California: Sage Publication.

Davidson, J. S., & Kammen, D. (2002 ). Indonesia's Unknown War and the Lineages of Violence in West Kalimantan. Indonesia No 73, 54.

DeVito, J. A. (1997). Komunikasi Antarmanusia (The Interpersonal Communication Book). Professional Book: Jakarta.

Dila, S. (2005 ). Simbolisasi Etnik Muna di Bandung:Studi Identitas Etnik Orang Muna. Mediator Vol 9 No 2, 317-326.

Karomani. (2005 ). Studi tentang Pengelolaan Kesan Elite Lokal Umaro terhadap Jawara dan Ulama di Banten Selatan. Mediator Vol 9 No 2, 351-358.

Moleong, L. J. (1993). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin.

Mulyana, D. (2000). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, D. (2001). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Peluso, N. L., & Harwell, E. (2001). Territory, Custom, and Politics of Ethnic War in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. In N. L. Peluso, & M. Watts, Violent Environment (p. 86). New York: Cornell University Press.

Smith, C. Q. (2012). The roots of violence and prospects for reconciliation : a case study of ethnic conflict in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Retrieved from www.agris.fao.org: http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US2012411029




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v10i2.2734

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

   

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License