Simbolisasi Etnik Muna di Bandung: Studi Identitas Etnik Orang Muna

Sumadi Dila

Abstract


The important thing of openness attitude, tolerance and  communication skill that are different in cultural at urban complex community is the successful key to make closer living in harmony side by side. This research is aimed to understant and to explain yhe interaction and the communication of Muna people in relating with their ethnic identity in cociety in Bandung. The result of research finds the constuction mechanism of Muna ethnic identity through the self strengthening, evaluation, dialogue, adaptation, and structuring that form Muna ethnic categiries of Regionalism, Prgmatic,and Religious. This research also find the accentuation of symbols, setting, and ethnic identity using in expressive and impressive manner based on personality (individual) and social. The identity of regionalism Muna ethnic as the past self consept is’n dominant anymore, on the contrary the identity of pragmatic Muna and relgious Muna ethnic are showed more often as the present self concept based on new situation. That’s done to complete the self adaptation in fostering the community awareness and acceptance.

Keywords


komunikasi, budaya, identitas etnik

References


Barth, Fredrik. 1988. Penerjemah: Nining I. Soesilo, Kelompok-Kelompok Etnik dan Batasannya, Jakarta: UI-Press.

Dilla, Sumadi. 2007. Komunikasi Pembangunan, Pendekatan Terpadu. Bandung: Simbiosa.

Goodman, Neal R. 1994. Cross Cultural Training for the Global Executive, Dalam Richard W. Brislin dan Tomoko Yoshida, ed, Improving Intercultural Communication, Modules. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Gudykunst, William B, dan Young Yun Kim. 1992. Communicating with Strangers: An approach ti Intercultural Communication. Edisi ke 2, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Hall, Edward T. Dan William Foote Whyte. 1996. “Komunikasi Antarbudaya: Suatu Tinjauan Antropologis.” Dalam Deddy Mulyana dan Jalaluddin Rahmat, ed. Komunikasi Antarbudaya: Panduan Berkomunikasi dengan orang-orang yang berbeda budaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Hofstede, Geert. 1994. Cultures and Organization: Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. London: HarperCollins.

Hogg, M.A. & Abram, D.1988. Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relation and Group Processes. London: Routledge.

Liliweri, Alo. 2001. Gatra-Gatra Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Mulyana D. 2002. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

————. 2004. Komunikasi Efektif: Suatu Pendekatan Lintas Budaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

————. Solatun. 2007. Metodelogi Penelitian Komunikasi: Contoh-contoh Penelitian Kualitatif dengan pendekatan Praktis.

Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Suparlan, Parsudi 1999, Masyarakat Majemuk dan Hubungan Antarsuku Bangsa. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Tubbs, Stewart L, dan Sylvia Moss. 1996. Human Communication I dan II, edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Penerjemah Deddy Mulyana. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i2.1123

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

   

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License