Makna Komunikasi Simbolik di Kalangan Pengguna Tato Kota Bandung

Gumgum Gumilar

Abstract


The aim of this research is to give result qualitative data through phenomenological approach and symbolic interaction about tattoos among its users. The focus of this research includes its development, motivation and the process of making tattoo, symbolic meaning and impression management were done in communication among tattoo users in Bandung. The research informant in this research was 24 tattoo permanent users with using purposive sampling. The data collecting used in this research were observation, depth interview and documentation/archive study. The result of this research showed that tattoo users could be categorized based on: Reasons, contact and immanent tattoo users; motive, past and future orientation tattoo users; design, classical, modern, and contemporary tattoo users; Tattoo placing, open and close tattoo users, and studio preferences, safe and risk tattoo users. In addition, tattoo artists could be categorized in; the period of profession, past and current tattoo artist; the tool in making tattoo, traditional and modern; the process of tattooing, safe and risk; skills, independent learner artist and special learning learner artist; the place of tattoo making, professional and street vendor artist.

Keywords


tato, komunikasi simbolik, makna

References


Basrowi & Sudikin. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Perspektif Mikro. Surabaya: Insan Cendikian.

Becker, S. Howard. 1997. “Becoming a Marihuana User” Kumpulan teori-teori Sosial dan Fenomenologi sampai Behavioral. Pascasarjana Unpad Bandung.

Black, Reed H. and Edwin O. Haroldsen. 1979. A Taxonomy of Concept in Communication. Hastings House. Publishers. New York. Cassirer, Ernst. 1987. Manusia dan Kebudayaan: Sebuah Esei tentang Manusia. Diterjemahkan oleh Alois A. Nugroho. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. Sage Publication Inc. USA.

Hayawaka, S.I. 1998. “Simbol-simbol.” Dalam Deddy Mulyana dan Jalaludin Rakhmat. Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Koentjaraningrat. 1985. Kebudayaan, Mentalitas, dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Littlejohn, Stephen W. 1996. Theories of Human Communication. Fifth Edition, Belmont California: Eadsworth Publishing Company.

Miller, J.C. 1997. The Body Art Book. New York: Barkeley Books.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyana, Deddy. 2000. Ilmu Komunikasi: Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

_______________. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Paradigma Baru Ilmu Komunikasi dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Olong, HA. Kadir. 2006. Tato. Yogyakarta: PT. LKiS Pelangi Aksara.

Phelan, Michael P. And Scott A. Hunt. 1998. Prison Gang Members’s Tatoos as identity Work: The Visual Communication of Moral Careers. University of Kentucky

Schutz, Alfred. 1972. The Phenomenological of The Social World. London: Heinemann Educational Book.

Van Zoest, Aart dan Panuti Sujiman (ed.). 1992 Serba-serbi Semiotika. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Wood, Julia T. 1998. Communications Mosaics. Belmont, California: Wadswort.

Sumber lain:

Gatra. 2001. Tato Mentawai Tertua di Dunia. No. 20. 2 April.

Kompas, Ady Rosa. 2001. ‘Jenderal Tato’. Sabtu, 24 Februari

Rosa, Adi. 1994. Eksistensi Tato sebagai Salah Satu Karya Seni Rupa Tradisional Masyarakat Mentawai. Bandung: Tesis

Institut Teknologi Bandung.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v9i1.1140

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

   

 


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a 
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License